4.8 sec in total
16 ms
4.3 sec
522 ms
Visit servicekeepers.com now to see the best up-to-date Service Keepers content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about servicekeepers.com
Turn to Service Keepers Maintenance, Inc. for commercial cleaning services. We serve clients across South Florida.
Visit servicekeepers.comWe analyzed Servicekeepers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
servicekeepers.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value15.8 s
0/100
25%
Value15.6 s
0/100
10%
Value9,220 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.369
29/100
15%
Value36.1 s
0/100
10%
16 ms
1603 ms
279 ms
309 ms
397 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Servicekeepers.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Servicekeepers.com.
Page size can be reduced by 136.3 kB (9%)
1.6 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Servicekeepers.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Service Keepers images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 925 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Servicekeepers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.8 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (70%)
82
25
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Service Keepers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
servicekeepers.com
16 ms
servicekeepers.com
1603 ms
js
279 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
309 ms
gtranslate-style24.css
397 ms
style.min.css
479 ms
all.min.css
470 ms
style.css
475 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.min.css
467 ms
swiper.min.css
502 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
504 ms
9-layout.css
611 ms
frontend.min.css
560 ms
flatpickr.min.css
582 ms
select2.min.css
544 ms
animate.css
537 ms
5e99bdbcf603a07a0c3e427e34b00988-layout-bundle.css
583 ms
GD-cORe-public.css
704 ms
base.min.css
709 ms
skin-62fba809b6f6e.css
704 ms
animate.min.css
740 ms
css
500 ms
jquery.min.js
740 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
702 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
825 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
824 ms
flatpickr.min.js
822 ms
select2.min.js
823 ms
GD-cORe-public.js
823 ms
init.js
821 ms
iframeResizer.min.js
916 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
916 ms
css
654 ms
js
460 ms
nloader.js
497 ms
css
817 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
912 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.min.js
911 ms
swiper.jquery.min.js
911 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
870 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
1003 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
999 ms
9-layout.js
1001 ms
20922739.js
815 ms
frontend.min.js
1001 ms
analytics.js
518 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
707 ms
a7b81483829c9b32395a575a6feea124-layout-bundle.js
621 ms
theme.min.js
763 ms
tti.min.js
689 ms
d9addf525b6a.js
572 ms
js
307 ms
gtm.js
305 ms
fbevents.js
424 ms
fl_miami_carpet-cleaners_2022_transparent.svg
1039 ms
condominium-circle.jpg
232 ms
school-campus-circle.jpg
230 ms
office-buildings-circle.jpg
226 ms
Green_Gloves-circle.jpg
223 ms
qtq80-BRF5Jw-scaled-circle.jpeg
291 ms
qtq80-9NT4d5-circle.jpeg
268 ms
qtq80-sby6uU-scaled-circle.jpeg
348 ms
qtq80-V03cD8-circle.jpeg
349 ms
linkid.js
242 ms
tccl.min.js
125 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
225 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
226 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
804 ms
rP2Cp2ywxg089UriASitCBimDg.ttf
807 ms
rP2Cp2ywxg089UriAWCrCBimDg.ttf
805 ms
rP2Hp2ywxg089UriCZOIGA.ttf
892 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
117 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
114 ms
place
1194 ms
logo-servicekeepers.png
668 ms
collect
547 ms
collect
502 ms
641321176716749
630 ms
Ultimate-Icons.ttf
440 ms
download.png
439 ms
GBACStarLogo.jpg
437 ms
ISSA.png
438 ms
Woman-owned.jpg
437 ms
AHE_logo_PMS.jpg
440 ms
264 ms
bx_loader.gif
93 ms
rP2Fp2ywxg089UriCZa4Hz-G.ttf
97 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
93 ms
collect
264 ms
collect
349 ms
particles.js
251 ms
1f331.svg
210 ms
collectedforms.js
184 ms
20922739.js
208 ms
20922739.js
256 ms
conversations-embed.js
146 ms
ga-audiences
65 ms
js
108 ms
servicekeepers.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
servicekeepers.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
servicekeepers.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Servicekeepers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Servicekeepers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
servicekeepers.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Service Keepers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: