9.3 sec in total
2.6 sec
5.8 sec
894 ms
Click here to check amazing Sesc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sesc.org.uk
Effective, Tailored Support and Advice for Businesses from the Social Enterprise Support Centre.
Visit sesc.org.ukWe analyzed Sesc.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
sesc.org.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value400 ms
67/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
2583 ms
262 ms
24 ms
404 ms
805 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Sesc.org.uk, 32% (34 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 14% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Sesc.org.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (51%)
3.6 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Sesc.org.uk main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sesc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 998.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 998.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 662.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sesc.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 662.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (45%)
86
47
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sesc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sesc.org.uk
2583 ms
layerslider.css
262 ms
css
24 ms
settings.css
404 ms
styles.min.css
805 ms
pe-line-icons.min.css
186 ms
font-awesome.min.css
273 ms
icomoon-fonts.min.css
468 ms
theme-icons.min.css
344 ms
css
34 ms
style.css
349 ms
custom.css
365 ms
js_composer.css
537 ms
masterslider.main.css
487 ms
custom.css
333 ms
greensock.js
481 ms
jquery.js
607 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
442 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
714 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
572 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
746 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
803 ms
classic-081711.css
10 ms
comment-reply.min.js
675 ms
SmoothScroll.js
676 ms
vendors-ck.js
888 ms
scripts.js
887 ms
jquerytransit.js
678 ms
js
26 ms
logo-black.png
429 ms
logo-white.png
427 ms
img2.jpg
658 ms
img1.jpg
571 ms
yourconsortium-2z9tm3j9i5szmoi571wl4w.jpg
426 ms
esf-2z9tlz0f7mm7kxmrbv8zcw.jpg
427 ms
hmp-2z9tm0w9u0m19ntu3v0tfk.jpg
429 ms
SWYPFT-2z9tm2a138h3u71fce2134.jpg
428 ms
captcha.php
910 ms
03.jpg
920 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
11 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
12 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTY3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
13 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
10 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
10 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
11 ms
theme-icons.woff
407 ms
icomoon.woff
510 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxt6Naowg1QhaIq8kLGtQSos.ttf
11 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBiwlidHJgAgmTjOEEzwu1L8.ttf
9 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxs1QGe9x6ME_FQCWJB3n6z8.ttf
10 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxjdGNerWpg2Hn6A-BxWgZ_I.ttf
322 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxkdJXfhP-2RmnAuS9A2rxpE.ttf
322 ms
analytics.js
320 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
241 ms
collect
13 ms
common.js
9 ms
map.js
9 ms
util.js
62 ms
marker.js
62 ms
onion.js
18 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
42 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
100 ms
stats.js
28 ms
controls.js
24 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
70 ms
transparent.png
30 ms
css
73 ms
infowindow.js
83 ms
google4.png
78 ms
locator1.png
142 ms
mapcnt6.png
34 ms
sv5.png
35 ms
tmapctrl.png
36 ms
cb_scout5.png
36 ms
tmapctrl4.png
38 ms
imgs8.png
37 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
28 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
22 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
28 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
29 ms
vt
62 ms
vt
78 ms
vt
50 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
50 ms
vt
60 ms
vt
83 ms
vt
117 ms
vt
88 ms
vt
95 ms
vt
106 ms
vt
122 ms
vt
119 ms
vt
158 ms
vt
150 ms
vt
148 ms
vt
160 ms
vt
169 ms
vt
165 ms
vt
182 ms
vt
187 ms
vt
197 ms
vt
216 ms
vt
203 ms
vt
214 ms
sesc.org.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
sesc.org.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sesc.org.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sesc.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sesc.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sesc.org.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sesc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: