6.2 sec in total
735 ms
5 sec
441 ms
Click here to check amazing Sgm Eng content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sgm-eng.ru
Союзгормаш-Инжиниринг - проектирование, поставка и сервисное обслуживание дробилок, грохотов и дробильно-сортировочных линий.
Visit sgm-eng.ruWe analyzed Sgm-eng.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 735 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
sgm-eng.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value6.4 s
59/100
10%
735 ms
134 ms
380 ms
254 ms
276 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Sgm-eng.ru, 10% (8 requests) were made to Leadhacker.ru and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Sgm-eng.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 277.6 kB (17%)
1.6 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Sgm-eng.ru main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sgm Eng images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 189.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 189.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sgm-eng.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (49%)
82
42
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sgm Eng. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sgm-eng.ru
735 ms
template.css.php
134 ms
jquery.min.js
380 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
254 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
276 ms
caption.js
270 ms
logic.js
269 ms
system.css
269 ms
Styles.css
425 ms
style-slider.css
424 ms
default.css
423 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
549 ms
jqueryslidemenu.js
427 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
505 ms
js.js
546 ms
device.js
551 ms
AC_ActiveX.js
547 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
552 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
629 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
671 ms
colorbox.css
674 ms
Styles-mobile.css
674 ms
lh.load.v2.js
284 ms
system.css
284 ms
bg.jpg
536 ms
header_bg_1.jpg
650 ms
head.jpg
1293 ms
logo.gif
1647 ms
menu_top.jpg
1055 ms
2_lvl.jpg
804 ms
str_3.gif
659 ms
slider_bg.jpg
899 ms
loading.gif
790 ms
slide_1-stacionarnye-drobilki.jpg
1682 ms
slide_2-stacionarnye-drobilki.jpg
2064 ms
slide_3-polumobilnye-drobilki.jpg
1428 ms
slide_4-polumobilnye-drobilki.jpg
1811 ms
slide_5-mobilnye-drobilki.jpg
2173 ms
slide_6-mobilnye-drobilki.jpg
2057 ms
slide_7-samohodnaya-drobilka-FlexImpact.jpg
3383 ms
stat.jpg
2572 ms
st_bg.png
2341 ms
conecrusherfix-8a39453f670b3f22441ee10514a55540.jpg
2182 ms
str.png
2188 ms
01-0ba815026a7c9db20f76330177e1f7a1.jpg
2324 ms
plitischekovoidrobilki-f839035baefa45c5d6654e4211f4e0c6.jpg
2342 ms
y.jpg
2483 ms
q.png
2487 ms
news_2.jpg
2488 ms
news_1.jpg
2494 ms
news_3.jpg
2610 ms
fleximpactp28hsicrusher6501-9d25a22b0bc78afa1e143a9512a27799.jpg
2618 ms
mosavtodor1s-378429cccdd144af5a3d972b2664defe.jpg
2619 ms
drobmash-1773418e71b8c85707c2902dbb1385b2.jpg
2621 ms
logo_1.jpg
2702 ms
logo_2.jpg
2742 ms
psp_logo.png
2745 ms
logo_d_5.jpg
2750 ms
logo_d_2.jpg
2748 ms
watch.js
28 ms
ga.js
142 ms
logo_d_3.jpg
2797 ms
lh.app.v2.js
542 ms
__utm.gif
33 ms
logo_d_4.jpg
2344 ms
v.js
419 ms
bg_footer.jpg
2236 ms
dot_s.gif
2226 ms
b_logo.jpg
2101 ms
bg_nav.jpg
2180 ms
overlay.png
2116 ms
controls.png
1963 ms
main.b_design.css
113 ms
main.branding.css
193 ms
b_design_override.css
199 ms
main.button.css
199 ms
new_button_1_override.css
202 ms
css
40 ms
border.png
1726 ms
loading_background.png
1599 ms
loading.gif
1482 ms
podrobnee.png
135 ms
arrows.png
131 ms
bullets.png
132 ms
sgm-eng.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sgm-eng.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
sgm-eng.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sgm-eng.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sgm-eng.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sgm-eng.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sgm Eng. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: