7.4 sec in total
850 ms
5.1 sec
1.4 sec
Visit sgtt.in now to see the best up-to-date Sgtt content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sgtt.in
Visit sgtt.inWe analyzed Sgtt.in page load time and found that the first response time was 850 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
sgtt.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value23.4 s
0/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value300 ms
78/100
30%
Value0.777
5/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
850 ms
406 ms
408 ms
414 ms
416 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Sgtt.in, 4% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Sgtt.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (9%)
11.7 MB
10.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Sgtt.in main page is 11.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 11.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 66.3 kB, which is 54% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.6 kB or 93% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 713.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sgtt images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 147.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 147.3 kB or 37% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sgtt.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 110.0 kB or 51% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (51%)
82
40
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sgtt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sgtt.in
850 ms
css2
406 ms
css2-1
408 ms
css2-2
414 ms
css2-3
416 ms
bootstrap.min.css
829 ms
bootstrap-select.min.css
434 ms
animate.min.css
613 ms
jquery-ui.css
615 ms
jarallax.css
620 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.css
627 ms
nouislider.min.css
652 ms
nouislider.pips.css
815 ms
tiny-slider.css
816 ms
style.css
827 ms
icofont.min.css
839 ms
daterangepicker.css
870 ms
all.min.css
32 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
1018 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
1019 ms
trevlo.css
1656 ms
mystyle.css
1035 ms
shree-ganesh-logo.png
1253 ms
sedan.jpg
1083 ms
innova-crysta.jpg
1217 ms
innova.jpg
1223 ms
Toyota-Etios.jpg
1240 ms
Suzuki-Ertiga-front-th.jpg
1514 ms
tempo.jpg
1617 ms
singapore.jpg
1626 ms
Malaysia.webp
2063 ms
dubai.webp
1779 ms
thailand.jpg
3667 ms
bali.jpg
2611 ms
Srilanka.webp
2033 ms
nepal.webp
1861 ms
kathmandu.webp
2508 ms
embed
213 ms
jquery-3.7.0.min.js
1879 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
1846 ms
bootstrap-select.min.js
1881 ms
jarallax.min.js
1887 ms
jquery-ui.js
2252 ms
js
53 ms
jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js
2066 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
1896 ms
jquery.circle-progress.min.js
2096 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
2102 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
2103 ms
nouislider.min.js
2174 ms
tiny-slider.js
2060 ms
wNumb.min.js
2102 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
2105 ms
wow.js
2107 ms
tilt.jquery.js
2194 ms
simpleParallax.min.js
2211 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
2114 ms
isotope.js
2125 ms
css2
47 ms
css2
64 ms
countdown.min.js
2118 ms
moment.min.js
2158 ms
daterangepicker.js
2066 ms
jquery.circleType.js
2117 ms
jquery.lettering.min.js
2109 ms
trevlo.js
2109 ms
coorg.webp
1931 ms
Untitled.jpg
1872 ms
about%20(6).png
2133 ms
about-1-shape-3.png
1778 ms
icomoon.ttf
1791 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
35 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
23 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
35 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyovBJ.ttf
35 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkCEv18E.ttf
36 ms
about-1-shape-1.png
1786 ms
about-1-shape-2.png
1659 ms
pack-1%20(2).png
2314 ms
pack-2%20(2).png
1676 ms
pack-3.png
1805 ms
pack-4%20(1).png
1612 ms
pack-5%20(1).png
1805 ms
testimonial-1-1.jpg
1476 ms
testimonial-1-2.jpg
1497 ms
testimonial-1-3.jpg
1602 ms
himachal-logo-removebg-preview.png
1567 ms
himachal-logo-favicon-removebg-preview.png
1511 ms
about-1-shape-4.png
1551 ms
testimonial-1-bg-2.png
1589 ms
benefit-bg-2.png
1607 ms
destination-himacahl.webp
1569 ms
footer-bg.png
1554 ms
close.svg
1547 ms
sgtt.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
sgtt.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
sgtt.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sgtt.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sgtt.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sgtt.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sgtt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: