4.1 sec in total
183 ms
3.1 sec
826 ms
Welcome to shadows.com homepage info - get ready to check Shadows best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about shadows.com
Visit shadows.comWe analyzed Shadows.com page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
shadows.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value14.3 s
0/100
25%
Value12.8 s
3/100
10%
Value2,840 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.333
34/100
15%
Value18.8 s
3/100
10%
183 ms
407 ms
79 ms
155 ms
225 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Shadows.com, 11% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (816 ms) belongs to the original domain Shadows.com.
Page size can be reduced by 147.2 kB (3%)
4.3 MB
4.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Shadows.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shadows images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 37.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shadows.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (82%)
87
16
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shadows. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shadows.com
183 ms
www.shadows.com
407 ms
style.min.css
79 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
155 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
225 ms
style.min.css
230 ms
style.min.css
229 ms
style.min.css
310 ms
style.min.css
237 ms
style.min.css
236 ms
style.min.css
299 ms
styles.css
303 ms
quiz-maker-public.css
313 ms
icomoon-the7-font.min.css
316 ms
all.min.css
375 ms
back-compat.min.css
378 ms
icomoon-font-awesome-14x14.css
379 ms
sv-wc-payment-gateway-payment-form.min.css
383 ms
js_composer_front_custom.css
470 ms
css
79 ms
main.min.css
498 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.css
448 ms
wpbakery.min.css
449 ms
post-type.min.css
453 ms
css-vars.css
458 ms
custom.css
603 ms
wc-dt-custom.css
533 ms
media.css
542 ms
mega-menu.css
540 ms
the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css
547 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
546 ms
style.css
612 ms
jquery.min.js
687 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
627 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
627 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
628 ms
js.cookie.min.js
676 ms
s-202419.js
57 ms
js
101 ms
js
136 ms
css
75 ms
api.js
83 ms
e-202419.js
56 ms
wc-blocks.css
679 ms
animate.min.css
633 ms
rs6.css
562 ms
woocommerce.min.js
491 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
532 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
531 ms
woocommerce.min.js
534 ms
main.min.js
816 ms
index.js
571 ms
index.js
570 ms
rbtools.min.js
695 ms
rs6.min.js
739 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
624 ms
order-attribution.min.js
625 ms
jquery.payment.min.js
564 ms
sv-wc-payment-gateway-payment-form.min.js
671 ms
wc-authorize-net-aim.min.js
669 ms
legacy.min.js
667 ms
jquery-mousewheel.min.js
655 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.js
673 ms
post-type.min.js
667 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
677 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
623 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
624 ms
index.js
711 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
724 ms
skrollr.min.js
726 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
724 ms
insight.min.js
161 ms
Shadows_Logo_B1_web-small-B.png
477 ms
the7-chevron-down.svg
477 ms
dummy.png
630 ms
Shadows_Logo_A1-web-small.png
629 ms
js
126 ms
analytics.js
169 ms
box-embroidery-1.webp
487 ms
IMG_5403-1-scaled.jpg
810 ms
Amalgamated-Sugar_Promo-46-2-1.jpg
732 ms
foot.jpg
486 ms
icomoon-the7-font.ttf
443 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYw.woff
264 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff
291 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff
290 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff
289 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
289 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
290 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
290 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
343 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
342 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
343 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
376 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
228 ms
recaptcha__en.js
293 ms
collect
55 ms
li_sync
179 ms
white-scaled.jpg
76 ms
black-scaled.jpg
151 ms
Albertsons_Swag-Box-63.jpg
535 ms
Shadows_Sales-91-2.jpg
539 ms
shadows.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shadows.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
shadows.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shadows.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shadows.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shadows.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shadows. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: