6.6 sec in total
2.9 sec
3.4 sec
266 ms
Visit shahkar.com now to see the best up-to-date Shahkar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shahkar.com
Visit shahkar.comWe analyzed Shahkar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
shahkar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value1,030 ms
26/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
2934 ms
48 ms
24 ms
66 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Shahkar.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Shahkar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 295.4 kB (36%)
830.4 kB
535.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Shahkar.com main page is 830.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 465.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shahkar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 149.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 149.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 112.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shahkar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 112.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (73%)
26
7
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shahkar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shahkar.com
2934 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
48 ms
css
24 ms
general-057a024.css
66 ms
layout-front_page-a2394e0.css
62 ms
responsive-grid-e5027ed.css
63 ms
styles.css
69 ms
shortcodes.css
71 ms
jquery.js
113 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
93 ms
selectnav.js
102 ms
block-dynamic-js-layout-front_page-d796752.js
93 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
102 ms
responsive-grid-js-e6e6939.js
100 ms
flexslider.css
141 ms
public.css
140 ms
animate.css
145 ms
public.css
142 ms
jquery.form.min.js
142 ms
scripts.js
161 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
165 ms
public.js
162 ms
q2UoKhWhbFaqiuZwmBcAcYhpOh1C0h1V4xBb5ZOWSJwO_7ND8XwSzu_LSPDFENadrgaU108JNneUiIow1566-h6211.jpg
282 ms
shahkar-profile-e1410540056264.jpg
99 ms
facebook3d.png
99 ms
youtube1-150x150.png
100 ms
Ur66QXTDfN1RjqAm41DRZZ0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
28 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
40 ms
shahkar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
shahkar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
shahkar.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shahkar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shahkar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shahkar.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shahkar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: