Tools & Wizards About Us
sharelive.tv screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

sharelive.tv

שרלייב - שירותי וידאו לייב - דף הבית

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

18 ms

Resources Loaded

891 ms

Page Rendered

717 ms

sharelive.tv screenshot

About Website

Visit sharelive.tv now to see the best up-to-date Sharelive content for Israel and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sharelive.tv

שידור חי באינטרנט | פייסבוק לייב | יוטיוב מערכות צילום ושידור חי לישיבות מועצה צילום והפקה לייב - אירועים | כנסים | חתונות צילום וידאו ומעגל סגור | ועידות וידאו

Visit sharelive.tv

Key Findings

We analyzed Sharelive.tv page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sharelive.tv performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

90/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value800 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.057

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sharelive.tv

18 ms

www.sharelive.tv

127 ms

LogoDesktop-1920w.png

128 ms

shutterstock_1250939041-1920w.png

188 ms

shutterstock_494136400-1920w.jpg

609 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Sharelive.tv, 59% (13 requests) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com and 18% (4 requests) were made to Static.cdn-website.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (759 ms) relates to the external source Lirp.cdn-website.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 246.8 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Sharelive.tv main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 940.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 246.5 kB

  • Original 298.3 kB
  • After minification 291.6 kB
  • After compression 51.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 246.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 55 B

  • Original 940.1 kB
  • After minification 940.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sharelive images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 177 B

  • Original 147.7 kB
  • After minification 147.7 kB
  • After compression 147.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (18%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sharelive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sharelive.tv

sharelive.tv

18 ms

www.sharelive.tv

www.sharelive.tv

127 ms

LogoDesktop-1920w.png

LogoDesktop-1920w.png

128 ms

shutterstock_1250939041-1920w.png

shutterstock_1250939041-1920w.png

188 ms

shutterstock_494136400-1920w.jpg

shutterstock_494136400-1920w.jpg

609 ms

3494-1920w.jpg

3494-1920w.jpg

759 ms

1925-1920w.jpg

1925-1920w.jpg

147 ms

OCIFXH0-1920w.jpg

OCIFXH0-1920w.jpg

539 ms

shutterstock_683396425-7fa061d0-1920w.jpg

shutterstock_683396425-7fa061d0-1920w.jpg

563 ms

young-man-portrait-1920w.jpg

young-man-portrait-1920w.jpg

151 ms

58f21775-85fd-4fc5-8154-c8edacad6812-1920w.jpg

58f21775-85fd-4fc5-8154-c8edacad6812-1920w.jpg

417 ms

blond-woman-portrait-1920w.jpg

blond-woman-portrait-1920w.jpg

194 ms

837a4687-9817-486a-b472-4750e33ede05-1920w.jpg

837a4687-9817-486a-b472-4750e33ede05-1920w.jpg

294 ms

TEAM_MEMBER_image4-250x263-1920w.jpg

TEAM_MEMBER_image4-250x263-1920w.jpg

417 ms

TEAM_MEMBER_image2-250x263-1920w.jpg

TEAM_MEMBER_image2-250x263-1920w.jpg

523 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

32 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

43 ms

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

45 ms

pixel.js

pixel.js

73 ms

opensanshebrew-bold-webfont.woff

opensanshebrew-bold-webfont.woff

32 ms

opensanshebrew-regular-webfont.woff

opensanshebrew-regular-webfont.woff

48 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2 ms

Accessibility Review

sharelive.tv accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

sharelive.tv best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sharelive.tv SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IW

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sharelive.tv can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Hebrew is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Sharelive.tv main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sharelive.tv

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sharelive. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: