7.1 sec in total
306 ms
5.6 sec
1.2 sec
Visit sheffield.com now to see the best up-to-date Sheffield content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sheffield.com
Interested in a career in flight dispatching? Our aircraft dispatcher school could help you. Learn more about Sheffield School of Aeronautics today.
Visit sheffield.comWe analyzed Sheffield.com page load time and found that the first response time was 306 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
sheffield.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value7.1 s
6/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value1,110 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
306 ms
86 ms
144 ms
153 ms
235 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Sheffield.com, 10% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Sheffield.com.
Page size can be reduced by 410.4 kB (44%)
931.2 kB
520.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Sheffield.com main page is 931.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 358.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sheffield images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 239.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 239.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 118.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sheffield.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 118.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (76%)
83
20
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sheffield. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sheffield.com
306 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
86 ms
css
144 ms
login.css
153 ms
dashicons.min.css
235 ms
thickbox.css
449 ms
styles.css
458 ms
public.css
167 ms
RL_public.css
443 ms
columns.css
223 ms
tabs.css
244 ms
dropcaps.css
312 ms
lists.css
317 ms
RT_Widget.css
596 ms
buttons.css
413 ms
style.css
413 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
873 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css
499 ms
jetpack.css
689 ms
jquery.js
1082 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
605 ms
jquery.anythingfader.js
573 ms
login.js
651 ms
public.js
673 ms
radical-testimonials.js
692 ms
coolstuff2.js
726 ms
thickbox.js
744 ms
jquery.form.min.js
751 ms
scripts.js
758 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
1336 ms
core.min.js
812 ms
widget.min.js
1340 ms
mouse.min.js
1324 ms
resizable.min.js
855 ms
draggable.min.js
902 ms
button.min.js
943 ms
position.min.js
945 ms
dialog.min.js
993 ms
e-201613.js
1333 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1384 ms
hoverIntent.js
1008 ms
superfish.js
1187 ms
supersubs.js
1182 ms
thematic-dropdowns.js
1126 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1121 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js
1112 ms
jquery.easing.pack.js
1043 ms
analytics.js
150 ms
collect
387 ms
page-bg.png
135 ms
outerwrapper-home-bg.jpg
996 ms
header-bg.jpg
178 ms
logo.png
134 ms
top-nav-bg.png
176 ms
top-nav-div.png
179 ms
top-arrow.png
232 ms
nav-div.png
241 ms
nav-over.png
239 ms
main-bg.png
240 ms
content-bg.png
242 ms
bucket-div.png
939 ms
seal.jpg
992 ms
bucket-btn.png
941 ms
Sheffield-School-of-Aeronautics-1954-and-Today.jpg
993 ms
Delta-and-KLM-Airlines.jpg
950 ms
test1-300x255.jpg
991 ms
side-div.jpg
941 ms
752997882.png
2332 ms
btn.png
990 ms
test-point.png
1040 ms
catalog.jpg
1114 ms
social-icons.png
1043 ms
adx-icon.png
1041 ms
isheff-icon.png
1040 ms
adx-thumb.jpg
1116 ms
footer-bg.png
1010 ms
subsid-wrapper.jpg
1014 ms
subsid-bg.png
1009 ms
sub-div.png
1087 ms
bullet.png
1085 ms
siteinfo-wrapper.jpg
1086 ms
footer-logo.png
1128 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
788 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTaRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
788 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
830 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzKRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
787 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
828 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxsBo4hlZyBvkZICS3KpNonM.woff
827 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxhbnBKKEOwRKgsHDreGcocg.woff
830 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxuw_rQOTGi-AJs5XCWaKIhU.woff
830 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBrrIa-7acMAeDBVuclsi6Gc.woff
824 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxvR_54zmj3SbGZQh3vCOwvY.woff
862 ms
collect
800 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
432 ms
ajax-loader.gif
324 ms
g.gif
104 ms
ga-audiences
245 ms
sheffield.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
sheffield.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sheffield.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sheffield.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sheffield.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sheffield.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sheffield. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: