Tools & Wizards About Us
shellwoodblake.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

shellwoodblake.co.uk

Home | Shellwoodblake

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

96 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

80 ms

shellwoodblake.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to shellwoodblake.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Shellwoodblake best content right away, or after learning these important things about shellwoodblake.co.uk

Visit shellwoodblake.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Shellwoodblake.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shellwoodblake.co.uk performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.shellwoodblake.com

96 ms

minified.js

49 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

45 ms

polyfill.min.js

1117 ms

thunderbolt-commons.67a94d55.bundle.min.js

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Shellwoodblake.co.uk, 32% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 26% (13 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 755.0 kB (62%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

455.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Shellwoodblake.co.uk main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 807.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 651.2 kB

  • Original 807.0 kB
  • After minification 805.4 kB
  • After compression 155.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 651.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 47.3 kB
  • After minification 40.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Shellwoodblake needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 96.6 kB

  • Original 355.7 kB
  • After minification 355.7 kB
  • After compression 259.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.6 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (33%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shellwoodblake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.shellwoodblake.com

www.shellwoodblake.com

96 ms

minified.js

minified.js

49 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

45 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1117 ms

thunderbolt-commons.67a94d55.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.67a94d55.bundle.min.js

65 ms

main.e9b48348.bundle.min.js

main.e9b48348.bundle.min.js

72 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

69 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

72 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

69 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

74 ms

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

70 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

72 ms

d946a9_c4376ddcd0f942e9975fe39b40bd780e~mv2.png

d946a9_c4376ddcd0f942e9975fe39b40bd780e~mv2.png

238 ms

d946a9_7836b0211b92496ba36cf10335df782cf000.jpg

d946a9_7836b0211b92496ba36cf10335df782cf000.jpg

423 ms

white%20shellwoodBlake_logos_final.png

white%20shellwoodBlake_logos_final.png

487 ms

d946a9_2725f5a6f72e421193d72ef2b9e96c49~mv2.png

d946a9_2725f5a6f72e421193d72ef2b9e96c49~mv2.png

379 ms

d946a9_747756e9d28a4165a424a6043eb854e7~mv2.png

d946a9_747756e9d28a4165a424a6043eb854e7~mv2.png

346 ms

d946a9_8aa88019bce84ceea5e4152d4ff75270~mv2.jpg

d946a9_8aa88019bce84ceea5e4152d4ff75270~mv2.jpg

348 ms

d946a9_c05bce0d964f4dabb821e0d07aae94a7~mv2.jpeg

d946a9_c05bce0d964f4dabb821e0d07aae94a7~mv2.jpeg

419 ms

d946a9_1404e863345e49ebaee3e264a0ad9527~mv2.webp

d946a9_1404e863345e49ebaee3e264a0ad9527~mv2.webp

527 ms

d946a9_3dfada2a81354706a6f9839fbbeaf34c~mv2.png

d946a9_3dfada2a81354706a6f9839fbbeaf34c~mv2.png

602 ms

d946a9_e14d2952f7ae4b248967e6f077af44c8~mv2.png

d946a9_e14d2952f7ae4b248967e6f077af44c8~mv2.png

819 ms

d946a9_b27a2e40b608421e8187d5f2a10cd22c~mv2.png

d946a9_b27a2e40b608421e8187d5f2a10cd22c~mv2.png

2656 ms

WhatsApp%20Image%202024-10-31%20at%2014_33_edited.jpg

WhatsApp%20Image%202024-10-31%20at%2014_33_edited.jpg

661 ms

Screenshot%202024-06-03%20at%2017_19_50.png

Screenshot%202024-06-03%20at%2017_19_50.png

915 ms

rosie_600w.jpg

rosie_600w.jpg

652 ms

87868907_10158036531936241_7069144010299.png

87868907_10158036531936241_7069144010299.png

773 ms

helenbw_500w.jpg

helenbw_500w.jpg

903 ms

Untitled%20design%20(2).png

Untitled%20design%20(2).png

883 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

90 ms

173 ms

160 ms

166 ms

174 ms

173 ms

168 ms

198 ms

215 ms

211 ms

206 ms

202 ms

206 ms

228 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

7 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

30 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

21 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

12 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

5 ms

Accessibility Review

shellwoodblake.co.uk accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

shellwoodblake.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

shellwoodblake.co.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shellwoodblake.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shellwoodblake.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shellwoodblake.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shellwoodblake. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: