Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

sheratonmiramarhotel.com

Viña Del Mar Chile Hotel | Sheraton Miramar Hotel & Convention Center

Page Load Speed

38.2 sec in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

27.3 sec

Page Rendered

10.9 sec

sheratonmiramarhotel.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sheratonmiramarhotel.com homepage info - get ready to check Sheraton Miramar Hotel best content right away, or after learning these important things about sheratonmiramarhotel.com

Visit sun-soaked Chile during your stay at Sheraton Miramar Hotel and Convention Center, our Viña del Mar hotel with beachfront rooms and an on-site spa.

Visit sheratonmiramarhotel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sheratonmiramarhotel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 38.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sheratonmiramarhotel.com performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20,420 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.273

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value56.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sheratonmiramarhotel.com

42 ms

www.sheratonmiramarhotel.com

11 ms

4639 ms

marriottCommon.js

1056 ms

clientlib-base.min.569a20d572bd560535b3c0a54ddfbdfc.css

1040 ms

Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Sheratonmiramarhotel.com, 37% (42 requests) were made to Cache.marriott.com and 26% (30 requests) were made to Marriott.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14.4 sec) relates to the external source Cache.marriott.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (8%)

Content Size

14.3 MB

After Optimization

13.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Sheratonmiramarhotel.com main page is 14.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 12.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 250.7 kB

  • Original 291.4 kB
  • After minification 260.6 kB
  • After compression 40.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 250.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

  • Original 12.8 MB
  • After minification 12.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sheraton Miramar Hotel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 812.7 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 382.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 812.7 kB or 68% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (49%)

Requests Now

97

After Optimization

49

The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sheraton Miramar Hotel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sheratonmiramarhotel.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

sheratonmiramarhotel.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

sheratonmiramarhotel.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sheratonmiramarhotel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sheratonmiramarhotel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sheraton Miramar Hotel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: