12.8 sec in total
3.6 sec
8.7 sec
517 ms
Visit sheville.org now to see the best up-to-date Sheville content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sheville.org
An online magazine devoted to the female spirit and the pursuit of equality.
Visit sheville.orgWe analyzed Sheville.org page load time and found that the first response time was 3.6 sec and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
sheville.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value6.9 s
6/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value160 ms
93/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.4 s
48/100
10%
3554 ms
366 ms
366 ms
638 ms
623 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Sheville.org, 5% (5 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Sheville.org.
Page size can be reduced by 831.5 kB (53%)
1.6 MB
738.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Sheville.org main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 914.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sheville images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 622.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 622.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 163.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sheville.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 163.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (70%)
92
28
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sheville. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sheville.org
3554 ms
lists.css
366 ms
slideshow.css
366 ms
wk-styles-8f97d833.css
638 ms
jquery.js
623 ms
mootools-core.js
663 ms
core.js
466 ms
mootools-more.js
1260 ms
mootools-mobile.js
549 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
686 ms
roksprocket.js
736 ms
roksprocket.request.js
748 ms
lists.js
737 ms
moofx.js
1683 ms
features.js
944 ms
slideshow.js
877 ms
uikit-efb3ee22.js
2142 ms
wk-scripts-03e4e850.js
899 ms
base.css
763 ms
layout.css
782 ms
menus.css
860 ms
modules.css
862 ms
tools.css
894 ms
system.css
1006 ms
extensions.css
1006 ms
custom.css
1011 ms
animation.css
1111 ms
fabric.css
1112 ms
raspberryred.css
1111 ms
trebuchet.css
1217 ms
opensans.css
1524 ms
opensans.css
1230 ms
style.css
1241 ms
responsive.css
1328 ms
print.css
1334 ms
opensans.css
1349 ms
warp.js
1270 ms
responsive.js
1272 ms
accordionmenu.js
1183 ms
dropdownmenu.js
1210 ms
slim-081711.css
72 ms
embed.js
2920 ms
template.js
1138 ms
search.js
1104 ms
base.css
244 ms
layout.css
123 ms
menus.css
120 ms
modules.css
121 ms
tools.css
181 ms
system.css
177 ms
system.css
232 ms
system-all.css
242 ms
responsive.css
231 ms
print.css
300 ms
Asheville.gif
576 ms
fabric_dark.png
723 ms
logo.png
708 ms
HandsOnFeature.jpg
720 ms
MalapropsFeatureNew.jpg
739 ms
WeddingExpo.jpg
1488 ms
TaiChiChiGong.jpg
575 ms
WomensDay2.jpg
837 ms
OnTrack.jpg
847 ms
PhotoCraftFeature.jpg
1011 ms
rss-feed-link.png
848 ms
facebook-icon.png
871 ms
icon-googleplus.jpg
936 ms
Chestnut2Sidebar.jpg
947 ms
AAA%20Rain.jpg
961 ms
CornerKitchSidebar.jpg
965 ms
Barkwells2016SB.jpg
1163 ms
all.js
413 ms
searchbox_magnifier.png
1157 ms
fabric.png
1277 ms
header_stripes.png
1132 ms
pagination.png
1131 ms
totop_scroller.png
1133 ms
analytics.js
87 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
1110 ms
collect
118 ms
320 ms
xd_arbiter.php
353 ms
xd_arbiter.php
2713 ms
form-settings
188 ms
ping
96 ms
popup.js
619 ms
like.php
135 ms
CiVxVZUu1dU.js
1297 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
1409 ms
common.css
64 ms
layout-4.css
113 ms
modal.css
154 ms
86390858-9e64-42ae-bf5c-60beed89de7d.png
264 ms
menu_dropdown_level2.png
108 ms
sheville.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sheville.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sheville.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sheville.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sheville.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sheville.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sheville. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: