Tools & Wizards About Us
shieldinx.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

shieldinx.com

Home - Shieldinx

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

214 ms

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

782 ms

shieldinx.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to shieldinx.com homepage info - get ready to check Shieldinx best content right away, or after learning these important things about shieldinx.com

Visit shieldinx.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shieldinx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shieldinx.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,220 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shieldinx.com

214 ms

www.shieldinx.com

3849 ms

all.min.css

189 ms

mlj7sew.css

119 ms

styles.css

275 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Shieldinx.com, 21% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Shieldinx.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 195.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shieldinx.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 140.5 kB

  • Original 172.6 kB
  • After minification 169.5 kB
  • After compression 32.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 55.2 kB

  • Original 3.7 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shieldinx images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (48%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shieldinx. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

shieldinx.com

shieldinx.com

214 ms

www.shieldinx.com

www.shieldinx.com

3849 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

189 ms

mlj7sew.css

mlj7sew.css

119 ms

styles.css

styles.css

275 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

272 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

359 ms

style.css

style.css

348 ms

style.css

style.css

348 ms

language-cookie.js

language-cookie.js

363 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

363 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

443 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

456 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

665 ms

common.js

common.js

481 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

521 ms

p.css

p.css

44 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

118 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

167 ms

Group-429.png

Group-429.png

142 ms

Group-433.png

Group-433.png

149 ms

en.svg

en.svg

140 ms

Conductive-elastomers-3.png

Conductive-elastomers-3.png

698 ms

Conductive-elastomers2222.png

Conductive-elastomers2222.png

348 ms

Conductive-elastomers1.png

Conductive-elastomers1.png

306 ms

Conductive-elastomers2.png

Conductive-elastomers2.png

389 ms

Absorber-BandSorb-SC-002-1.png

Absorber-BandSorb-SC-002-1.png

263 ms

Absorber-BandSorb-SC-002.png

Absorber-BandSorb-SC-002.png

891 ms

Path-607.png

Path-607.png

358 ms

NoPath-kopie-9@2x.png

NoPath-kopie-9@2x.png

563 ms

11.png

11.png

557 ms

NoPath-kopie-28444.png

NoPath-kopie-28444.png

663 ms

Path-608.png

Path-608.png

475 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff

29 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

30 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff

43 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

53 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff

53 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

56 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff

54 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

55 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff

54 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

55 ms

d

d

7 ms

d

d

17 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

524 ms

Conductive-elastomer32.png

Conductive-elastomer32.png

841 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

93 ms

Accessibility Review

shieldinx.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

shieldinx.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

shieldinx.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shieldinx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shieldinx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shieldinx.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shieldinx. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: