4.4 sec in total
723 ms
3.5 sec
179 ms
Click here to check amazing Shieldwatch content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shieldwatch.com
*Source: Ponemon Institute & IBM Security: Cost of a Data Breach Report 2022
Visit shieldwatch.comWe analyzed Shieldwatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 723 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
shieldwatch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value11.6 s
0/100
25%
Value7.1 s
30/100
10%
Value990 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.158
74/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
723 ms
300 ms
125 ms
494 ms
186 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Shieldwatch.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Js-agent.newrelic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Shieldwatch.com.
Page size can be reduced by 610.5 kB (49%)
1.2 MB
629.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Shieldwatch.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 656.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 141.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Shieldwatch needs image optimization as it can save up to 141.7 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 337.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 337.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shieldwatch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 100.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (46%)
63
34
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shieldwatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shieldwatch.com
723 ms
style.css
300 ms
bxslider.css
125 ms
jquery-1.8.3.js
494 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
186 ms
slider.css
127 ms
easy-responsive-tabs.css
128 ms
dcmegamenu.css
184 ms
grey.css
186 ms
easyResponsiveTabs.js
186 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
367 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
245 ms
ddmegamenu.js
246 ms
small_desktop.js
246 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
2092 ms
script.js
261 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
262 ms
jquery.anyslider.js
308 ms
flexthumbnail.js
322 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
322 ms
request_info.png
124 ms
top_bg.jpg
71 ms
logo.png
124 ms
contact.png
125 ms
phone.png
128 ms
email.png
186 ms
mega-arrow.png
133 ms
mega-arrow2.png
184 ms
banner4-1.jpg
532 ms
banner7.jpg
548 ms
it_services.png
256 ms
web_dev.png
270 ms
staffing.png
319 ms
pen_testing.png
305 ms
brandon_chamber.jpg
318 ms
News_Channel_8.jpg
330 ms
kaseya_logo1.jpg
367 ms
tampa_chamber.jpg
379 ms
dell1.jpg
379 ms
office_3651.jpg
391 ms
netgear.jpg
428 ms
watchguard.jpg
439 ms
vmcare1.jpg
440 ms
cisco.jpg
451 ms
facebook.png
489 ms
twitter.png
501 ms
google_plus.png
502 ms
linkedin.png
513 ms
pinterest.png
550 ms
youtube.png
562 ms
rss.png
562 ms
analytics.js
42 ms
mid_bullet.png
575 ms
white_bullets.png
586 ms
footer_bg.jpg
591 ms
footer_sep.jpg
600 ms
phone_small.png
611 ms
collect
14 ms
futura_light_bt-webfont.woff
625 ms
futura_book_bt-webfont.woff
596 ms
fax.png
545 ms
copyright_bg.png
550 ms
bx_loader.gif
556 ms
controls.png
562 ms
footer_arrowdown.png
547 ms
footer_arrowup.png
550 ms
nr-892.min.js
18 ms
shieldwatch.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
shieldwatch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
shieldwatch.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shieldwatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Shieldwatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shieldwatch.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shieldwatch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: