2.2 sec in total
103 ms
1.4 sec
697 ms
Visit shmerida.com now to see the best up-to-date Shmerida content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shmerida.com
Software House Mérida, Yucatán, México, is organized around a new nearshoring software development concept. Programming talent is core to our business and to our clients' success. We hire for you and ...
Visit shmerida.comWe analyzed Shmerida.com page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
shmerida.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value23.9 s
0/100
25%
Value15.4 s
1/100
10%
Value2,340 ms
5/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value20.8 s
2/100
10%
103 ms
253 ms
93 ms
86 ms
98 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Shmerida.com, 70% (57 requests) were made to Shmerida.mx and 6% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (318 ms) relates to the external source Shmerida.mx.
Page size can be reduced by 163.1 kB (5%)
3.3 MB
3.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Shmerida.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.7 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shmerida images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shmerida.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (65%)
74
26
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shmerida. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shmerida.com
103 ms
shmerida.com
253 ms
css
93 ms
bootstrap.min.css
86 ms
all.css
98 ms
animate.min.css
83 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
82 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
91 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
81 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
80 ms
theme.css
92 ms
theme-elements.css
101 ms
theme-blog.css
100 ms
theme-shop.css
99 ms
settings.css
108 ms
layers.css
111 ms
navigation.css
115 ms
component.css
117 ms
default.css
119 ms
w3.css
75 ms
custom.css
118 ms
modernizr.min.js
119 ms
ckeditor.js
75 ms
api.js
96 ms
jquery.min.js
124 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
124 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
123 ms
jquery-cookie.min.js
124 ms
common.min.js
125 ms
jquery.validation.min.js
125 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.min.js
125 ms
jquery.gmap.min.js
126 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
127 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
126 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
128 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
128 ms
vide.min.js
127 ms
bootstrap.min.js
73 ms
theme.js
131 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
139 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
139 ms
theme.init.js
134 ms
examples.portfolio.js
318 ms
js
318 ms
font-awesome.min.css
27 ms
recaptcha__en.js
234 ms
YvMV1-BHcYg
306 ms
logo-default-slim-dark-small.png
144 ms
slider-1.jpg
203 ms
slider-3.jpg
201 ms
slide-20.jpg
146 ms
birkman.jpg
141 ms
quality.png
146 ms
challenging.png
204 ms
relationship.png
206 ms
logo-1.png
204 ms
logo-2.png
203 ms
logo-3.png
207 ms
logo-4.png
205 ms
logo-5.png
209 ms
logo-6.png
206 ms
logo-7.png
207 ms
logo-8.png
208 ms
logo-9.png
211 ms
logo-10.png
209 ms
logo-11.png
213 ms
logo-12.png
210 ms
nom035_seal.png
210 ms
logo-footer-sh2.png
212 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
141 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
143 ms
revicons.woff
151 ms
www-player.css
13 ms
www-embed-player.js
37 ms
base.js
91 ms
ad_status.js
195 ms
B7USFwsz_nMovXHWu4UwQRY0Qlt3iq-mQpCYnZ8jj34.js
95 ms
embed.js
44 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
129 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
130 ms
id
32 ms
shmerida.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shmerida.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
shmerida.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shmerida.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shmerida.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shmerida.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shmerida. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: