Tools & Wizards About Us
sierrastructural.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 94

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

sierrastructural.net

Sierra Consulting Structural Engineers

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

121 ms

Resources Loaded

844 ms

Page Rendered

104 ms

sierrastructural.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sierrastructural.net homepage info - get ready to check Sierra Structural best content right away, or after learning these important things about sierrastructural.net

Sierra Consulting Structural Engineers is a professional firm specializing in structural engineering design and consultation for architects, owners, and contractors.

Visit sierrastructural.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Sierrastructural.net page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 948 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sierrastructural.net performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sierrastructural.net

121 ms

css

22 ms

reset.css

56 ms

foundation.css

109 ms

ionicons.min.css

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Sierrastructural.net, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (556 ms) belongs to the original domain Sierrastructural.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 442.7 kB (6%)

Content Size

7.0 MB

After Optimization

6.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sierrastructural.net main page is 7.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 7.6 kB
  • After minification 5.9 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 402.8 kB

  • Original 6.7 MB
  • After minification 6.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sierra Structural images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 27.2 kB

  • Original 245.3 kB
  • After minification 245.3 kB
  • After compression 218.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 36.3 kB
  • After minification 36.3 kB
  • After compression 29.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sierrastructural.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (78%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sierra Structural. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sierrastructural.net

sierrastructural.net

121 ms

css

css

22 ms

reset.css

reset.css

56 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

109 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

106 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

105 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

104 ms

isotope.css

isotope.css

104 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

111 ms

validationEngine.jquery.css

validationEngine.jquery.css

157 ms

kose.css

kose.css

161 ms

kose-responsive.css

kose-responsive.css

158 ms

js

js

51 ms

custom.modernizr.js

custom.modernizr.js

158 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

214 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.2.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.10.2.custom.min.js

160 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

212 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.js

jquery.hoverIntent.js

210 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

210 ms

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

214 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

214 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

267 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

264 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

267 ms

jquery.transit.min.js

jquery.transit.min.js

267 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js

270 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

268 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

319 ms

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

319 ms

jquery.validationEngine.js

jquery.validationEngine.js

326 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

317 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

329 ms

jquery.BlackAndWhite.js

jquery.BlackAndWhite.js

330 ms

retina.js

retina.js

373 ms

kose.js

kose.js

372 ms

home1.jpg

home1.jpg

408 ms

home2.jpg

home2.jpg

459 ms

home3.jpg

home3.jpg

505 ms

home4.jpg

home4.jpg

556 ms

home5.jpg

home5.jpg

508 ms

logo.png

logo.png

411 ms

loading-bg.gif

loading-bg.gif

461 ms

qFdW35GdgYR8EzR6oBLDHa3wyRf8W8eBM6XLOXLMrcGGow.ttf

qFdW35GdgYR8EzR6oBLDHa3wyRf8W8eBM6XLOXLMrcGGow.ttf

9 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

14 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

18 ms

Accessibility Review

sierrastructural.net accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sierrastructural.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

sierrastructural.net SEO score

94

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sierrastructural.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sierrastructural.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sierrastructural.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sierra Structural. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: