Tools & Wizards About Us
sigga.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

sigga.net

Graphic design Swansea - Logo design Wales from SiGGA Design Ltd.

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

245 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

477 ms

sigga.net screenshot

About Website

Visit sigga.net now to see the best up-to-date SiGGA content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sigga.net

Graphic design,logo design, brochure design, website design, advertising and brand design, exhibition stands and stationery design by SiGGA Design, Swansea, Wales, UK

Visit sigga.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Sigga.net page load time and found that the first response time was 245 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sigga.net performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.269

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sigga.net

245 ms

boilerplate.css

154 ms

fluid.css

156 ms

sigga.css

155 ms

fonts.css

719 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Sigga.net, 3% (1 request) were made to Cloud.typography.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Sigga.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (39%)

Content Size

4.8 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sigga.net main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 13.7 kB

  • Original 18.6 kB
  • After minification 18.1 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 1.9 MB

  • Original 4.8 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SiGGA needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.9 MB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 3.2 kB
  • After minification 3.2 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 25.7 kB

  • Original 29.2 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sigga.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (32%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SiGGA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sigga.net

sigga.net

245 ms

boilerplate.css

boilerplate.css

154 ms

fluid.css

fluid.css

156 ms

sigga.css

sigga.css

155 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

719 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

158 ms

96E65CDBD1CA6F93D.css

96E65CDBD1CA6F93D.css

222 ms

siggaheaderlogo.jpg

siggaheaderlogo.jpg

317 ms

backarrow.png

backarrow.png

83 ms

nextarrow.png

nextarrow.png

83 ms

siggaheaderstrip.jpg

siggaheaderstrip.jpg

85 ms

siggawebsquares3.jpg

siggawebsquares3.jpg

383 ms

siggawebsquares4.jpg

siggawebsquares4.jpg

455 ms

fforestrevlogo460deep.fw.png

fforestrevlogo460deep.fw.png

605 ms

crclarkepricelist.png

crclarkepricelist.png

545 ms

siggaheaderstrip2.jpg

siggaheaderstrip2.jpg

164 ms

simongossmasite.jpg

simongossmasite.jpg

706 ms

willowsposterleaflet.jpg

willowsposterleaflet.jpg

560 ms

peterevansbanners.png

peterevansbanners.png

706 ms

narberthstationery.png

narberthstationery.png

541 ms

covernotes.jpg

covernotes.jpg

695 ms

gwyrprospectus.png

gwyrprospectus.png

1274 ms

sbssignage2.jpg

sbssignage2.jpg

806 ms

facebooklogo25.png

facebooklogo25.png

681 ms

twitterlogo25.png

twitterlogo25.png

762 ms

linkedinlogo25.png

linkedinlogo25.png

785 ms

g+logo25.png

g+logo25.png

865 ms

facebooklogo25_s2.png

facebooklogo25_s2.png

80 ms

twitterlogo25_s2.png

twitterlogo25_s2.png

80 ms

linkedinlogo25_s2.png

linkedinlogo25_s2.png

77 ms

g+logo25_s2.png

g+logo25_s2.png

230 ms

backarrow_s2.png

backarrow_s2.png

79 ms

nextarrow_s2.png

nextarrow_s2.png

78 ms

Accessibility Review

sigga.net accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sigga.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

sigga.net SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sigga.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sigga.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sigga.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SiGGA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: