Tools & Wizards About Us
sightseeingmanchester.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

sightseeingmanchester.com

Hop On, Hop Off Open Top Bus Tour Manchester | Sightseeing Manchester : Sightseeing Manchester

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

331 ms

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

620 ms

sightseeingmanchester.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sightseeingmanchester.com homepage info - get ready to check Sightseeing Manchester best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about sightseeingmanchester.com

Hop on board the Sightseeing Manchester Open-Top Bus Tour where you can enjoy some of the city's most famous and well-loved sights.

Visit sightseeingmanchester.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sightseeingmanchester.com page load time and found that the first response time was 331 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sightseeingmanchester.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.sightseeingmanchester.com

331 ms

3b8c4203ac00f724d3182f6557306869.css

78 ms

e3014d307167d50a137e58d6ae3c0d28.css

154 ms

f18ea803641745691b88f238ae74a74e.css

227 ms

2b9dea53ce74cc9183ae144f01db0556.css

233 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Sightseeingmanchester.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (422 ms) belongs to the original domain Sightseeingmanchester.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 48.4 kB (24%)

Content Size

200.3 kB

After Optimization

152.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sightseeingmanchester.com main page is 200.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 91.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 43.2 kB

  • Original 56.2 kB
  • After minification 56.0 kB
  • After compression 13.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 12.7 kB
  • After minification 8.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sightseeing Manchester needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 91.2 kB
  • After minification 91.2 kB
  • After compression 90.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 116 B

  • Original 40.2 kB
  • After minification 40.2 kB
  • After compression 40.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sightseeingmanchester.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (71%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sightseeing Manchester. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.sightseeingmanchester.com

www.sightseeingmanchester.com

331 ms

3b8c4203ac00f724d3182f6557306869.css

3b8c4203ac00f724d3182f6557306869.css

78 ms

e3014d307167d50a137e58d6ae3c0d28.css

e3014d307167d50a137e58d6ae3c0d28.css

154 ms

f18ea803641745691b88f238ae74a74e.css

f18ea803641745691b88f238ae74a74e.css

227 ms

2b9dea53ce74cc9183ae144f01db0556.css

2b9dea53ce74cc9183ae144f01db0556.css

233 ms

69fe1db57dc49fb6827469e08037ce4d.css

69fe1db57dc49fb6827469e08037ce4d.css

317 ms

a6b963a441d0002bbf22dce8b7c8ad51.css

a6b963a441d0002bbf22dce8b7c8ad51.css

241 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

42 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

30 ms

66db2f9c81f979efce7b884e7881305f.js

66db2f9c81f979efce7b884e7881305f.js

244 ms

479534503dafac052cf86e5a84513c3b.js

479534503dafac052cf86e5a84513c3b.js

245 ms

ce043d838af51e28657741bdd24c800d.js

ce043d838af51e28657741bdd24c800d.js

302 ms

41a5f8e2c92f5f64d25724ccbf5a283e.js

41a5f8e2c92f5f64d25724ccbf5a283e.js

309 ms

6258c07b6aa2b3816b1093358ddbc0fc.js

6258c07b6aa2b3816b1093358ddbc0fc.js

345 ms

b47f827760176c7769ffd6b063eb2d63.css

b47f827760176c7769ffd6b063eb2d63.css

356 ms

aac69cca8f99881b318e2859679aecdf.css

aac69cca8f99881b318e2859679aecdf.css

357 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

38 ms

989c4cd6ec05633ba0f5123ee4034a37.js

989c4cd6ec05633ba0f5123ee4034a37.js

422 ms

9f496523a90d0576931b825b77d77bf6.js

9f496523a90d0576931b825b77d77bf6.js

422 ms

4c94231208abdec735544f425d728bed.js

4c94231208abdec735544f425d728bed.js

422 ms

4c1c6f439a8ff7d67ce5660faef1b229.js

4c1c6f439a8ff7d67ce5660faef1b229.js

422 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

140 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

100 ms

iconmonstr-facebook-6.svg

iconmonstr-facebook-6.svg

92 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

92 ms

logo-shape-orange.png

logo-shape-orange.png

165 ms

riffic-bold-webfont.woff

riffic-bold-webfont.woff

167 ms

riffic-semibold-webfont.woff

riffic-semibold-webfont.woff

169 ms

368F3D_3_0.woff

368F3D_3_0.woff

102 ms

368F3D_1_0.woff

368F3D_1_0.woff

221 ms

368F3D_2_0.woff

368F3D_2_0.woff

204 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

66 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

326 ms

collect

collect

49 ms

js

js

33 ms

collect

collect

55 ms

js

js

87 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

40 ms

Accessibility Review

sightseeingmanchester.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

sightseeingmanchester.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sightseeingmanchester.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sightseeingmanchester.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sightseeingmanchester.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sightseeingmanchester.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sightseeing Manchester. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: