Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 72

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

sigmabeauty.com

Industry leading makeup brushes & revolutionary makeup brush care

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

127 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

596 ms

sigmabeauty.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sigmabeauty.com now to see the best up-to-date Sigmabeauty content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sigmabeauty.com

Indulge in Sigma Beauty's curated collection of industry leading makeup brushes, revolutionary brush care, and clean + cruelty free cosmetics. Elevate your routine with quality and innovation, cra...

Visit sigmabeauty.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sigmabeauty.com page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sigmabeauty.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value39.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value29.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,450 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value43.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sigmabeauty.com

127 ms

www.sigmabeauty.com

559 ms

fonts.css

412 ms

storefront.less

2177 ms

jquery.min.js

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Sigmabeauty.com, 58% (73 requests) were made to Cdn-tp1.mozu.com and 10% (12 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Cdn-tp1.mozu.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.5 MB (58%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Sigmabeauty.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 613.7 kB

  • Original 701.9 kB
  • After minification 632.9 kB
  • After compression 88.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 613.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 163.5 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sigmabeauty needs image optimization as it can save up to 163.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 974.9 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 866.3 kB
  • After compression 307.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 974.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 762.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 319.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sigmabeauty.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 762.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (74%)

Requests Now

104

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sigmabeauty. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 68 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sigmabeauty.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Best Practices

sigmabeauty.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sigmabeauty.com SEO score

72

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sigmabeauty.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sigmabeauty.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sigmabeauty. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: