2.2 sec in total
300 ms
1.8 sec
120 ms
Welcome to sigmatic.fi homepage info - get ready to check Sigmatic best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about sigmatic.fi
Hosting-palvelut 15 vuoden kokemuksella vaativaan tarpeeseen
Visit sigmatic.fiWe analyzed Sigmatic.fi page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
sigmatic.fi performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value680 ms
44/100
30%
Value0.714
7/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
300 ms
671 ms
203 ms
296 ms
300 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Sigmatic.fi, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (671 ms) belongs to the original domain Sigmatic.fi.
Page size can be reduced by 50.2 kB (26%)
193.6 kB
143.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Sigmatic.fi main page is 193.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 111.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sigmatic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 30% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sigmatic.fi has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (60%)
30
12
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sigmatic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sigmatic.fi
300 ms
www.sigmatic.fi
671 ms
bootstrap.min.css
203 ms
font-awesome.min.css
296 ms
styles.css
300 ms
css
76 ms
owl.carousel.css
300 ms
owl.theme.css
297 ms
nivo-lightbox.css
300 ms
default.css
301 ms
jquery.min.js
499 ms
jquery.flip.min.js
392 ms
bootstrap.min.js
396 ms
nivo-lightbox.min.js
393 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
395 ms
retina.min.js
393 ms
custom.js
489 ms
navbar-logo.png
489 ms
ssl.png
490 ms
bananas.png
492 ms
barabra.png
491 ms
mycashflow.png
593 ms
bellablogit.png
591 ms
sitelogic.png
592 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
27 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
32 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
36 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
456 ms
v2.zopim.com
65 ms
hotjar-56249.js
98 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
collect
17 ms
asset_composer.js
59 ms
collect
42 ms
js
82 ms
modules.842bcec28f9fd12bb79e.js
18 ms
ga-audiences
132 ms
sigmatic.fi accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sigmatic.fi best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
sigmatic.fi SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FI
FI
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sigmatic.fi can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Finnish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sigmatic.fi main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sigmatic.fi
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sigmatic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: