875 ms in total
52 ms
522 ms
301 ms
Welcome to signof2000.com homepage info - get ready to check Signof 2000 best content right away, or after learning these important things about signof2000.com
Awnings, Channel Letters, Clear Brass Awnings, Letters, Plaques, Neon, Architectural Sign, Auto Graphics, Directories & Builletin Boards, Large Format Printing, Menu Systems, Led Electronic Signs, Sto...
Visit signof2000.comWe analyzed Signof2000.com page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 823 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
signof2000.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.048
99/100
15%
Value4.9 s
78/100
10%
52 ms
34 ms
18 ms
28 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Signof2000.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (126 ms) belongs to the original domain Signof2000.com.
Page size can be reduced by 50.6 kB (2%)
2.4 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Signof2000.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Signof 2000 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 90 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Signof2000.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (15%)
39
33
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Signof 2000. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
signof2000.com
52 ms
signof2000.com
34 ms
css-5091f4197.css
18 ms
css-f1fbe0c4a.css
28 ms
font-awesome.min.css
37 ms
css-018334197.css
40 ms
js-acba1c951.js
69 ms
js-a643504a0.js
115 ms
my-slider.css
35 ms
ism-2.2.min.js
49 ms
css
16 ms
css
34 ms
k2.js
32 ms
system.css
7 ms
system.css
3 ms
analytics.js
126 ms
sign-2000-logo.png
24 ms
sign2000_locally_banner.jpg
47 ms
1676350000870_974265.jpg
75 ms
1676350000738_340740.jpg
121 ms
1676350000573_244829.jpg
68 ms
1676350000557_626992.jpg
68 ms
AWNING1.jpg
32 ms
channelletter1.jpg
38 ms
clearbrass_awning.jpg
47 ms
ACRYLIC.jpg
54 ms
plaques.jpg
49 ms
NEON1.jpg
56 ms
METAL.jpg
61 ms
autographic1.jpg
65 ms
DIRECTORIES.jpg
71 ms
banners.jpg
68 ms
MENUSYSTEM.jpg
89 ms
LED2.jpg
72 ms
STONE.jpg
76 ms
yardsigns.jpg
74 ms
lightingsyst.jpg
77 ms
LED_LIGHTS.jpg
89 ms
carved.jpg
81 ms
GOLDLEAFING.jpg
90 ms
illuminated.jpg
82 ms
lcd.jpg
113 ms
480x360-3.jpg
114 ms
11.jpg
89 ms
1.jpg
91 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
11 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
9 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
10 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
10 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
81 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
89 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
90 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
5 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
5 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
3 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
10 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
9 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
4 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
4 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
3 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
10 ms
signof2000.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
signof2000.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
signof2000.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Signof2000.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Signof2000.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
signof2000.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Signof 2000. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: