1.8 sec in total
40 ms
578 ms
1.2 sec
Visit signtext.com now to see the best up-to-date Signtext content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about signtext.com
Visit signtext.comWe analyzed Signtext.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
signtext.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.3 s
0/100
10%
Value25.3 s
0/100
25%
Value20.9 s
0/100
10%
Value5,140 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.133
81/100
15%
Value44.3 s
0/100
10%
40 ms
51 ms
56 ms
53 ms
190 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Signtext.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (313 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (19%)
6.5 MB
5.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Signtext.com main page is 6.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.2 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Signtext images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 364.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 364.9 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 809.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Signtext.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 809.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (35%)
62
40
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Signtext. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
signtext.com
40 ms
signtext.com
51 ms
css
56 ms
font-awesome.min.css
53 ms
all.css
190 ms
bootstrap.min.css
39 ms
swiper.min.css
46 ms
essentials.css
71 ms
layout.css
58 ms
theme7site.css
34 ms
header-1.css
34 ms
darkblue.css
53 ms
logo_dark_new.png
49 ms
biglogowht.png
49 ms
11.jpg
68 ms
widget.js
124 ms
SW-ADA.jpg
52 ms
SW%20Exhibit_edited.webp
52 ms
SW-Banners_edited.webp
52 ms
SW-Sign_edited.webp
64 ms
awning1.jpg
65 ms
banner.jpg
109 ms
cabinet.jpg
63 ms
channel.jpg
65 ms
digital.jpg
105 ms
dimensional.jpg
110 ms
displays.jpg
106 ms
elecdisplay5.jpg
107 ms
engraved.jpg
108 ms
flag2.jpg
108 ms
vehicle.jpg
114 ms
interior.jpg
110 ms
neon.jpg
111 ms
pylon.jpg
111 ms
sandblast2.jpg
112 ms
screen.jpg
112 ms
painting.jpg
113 ms
wrap.jpg
117 ms
vinyl.jpg
116 ms
realestatesite3.jpg
114 ms
install.jpg
115 ms
embed
313 ms
js
302 ms
jquery-3.3.1.min.js
115 ms
scripts.js
91 ms
swiper.min.js
91 ms
demo.swiper_slider.js
80 ms
contact.js
82 ms
gmaps.js
81 ms
manufacturing.jpg
80 ms
service.jpg
75 ms
survey.jpg
75 ms
2.jpg
79 ms
1.jpg
67 ms
9.jpg
65 ms
34.jpg
75 ms
6.jpg
68 ms
theme7.jpg
122 ms
js
84 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
75 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
115 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
129 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
128 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
129 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
130 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
130 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
129 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
129 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
128 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
14 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
15 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
8 ms
font-icons.woff
14 ms
bootstrap.min.js
26 ms
smoothscroll.js
26 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
30 ms
jquery.nav.min.js
24 ms
jquery.simple-text-rotator.min.js
22 ms
signtext.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
signtext.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
signtext.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Signtext.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Signtext.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
signtext.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Signtext. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: