Tools & Wizards About Us
sigprint.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

sigprint.net

Custom Printing Solutions - Massachusetts Custom Printing | Signature Printing + Consulting

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

97 ms

Resources Loaded

978 ms

Page Rendered

619 ms

sigprint.net screenshot

About Website

Visit sigprint.net now to see the best up-to-date Sigprint content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sigprint.net

Signature Printing & Consulting, a woman and veteran owned business, is the culmination of over 80 years of print manufacturing experience...

Visit sigprint.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Sigprint.net page load time and found that the first response time was 97 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sigprint.net performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sigprint.net

97 ms

sigprint.net

127 ms

prettyPhoto.css

47 ms

wp-video-lightbox.css

65 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Sigprint.net, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (476 ms) belongs to the original domain Sigprint.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 246.7 kB (37%)

Content Size

674.9 kB

After Optimization

428.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sigprint.net main page is 674.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 406.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 95.1 kB

  • Original 114.7 kB
  • After minification 111.1 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 15.1 kB
  • After minification 11.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sigprint needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 144.1 kB

  • Original 406.9 kB
  • After minification 402.4 kB
  • After compression 262.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.1 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 138.1 kB
  • After minification 137.6 kB
  • After compression 134.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sigprint.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (79%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sigprint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sigprint.net

sigprint.net

97 ms

sigprint.net

sigprint.net

127 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

47 ms

wp-video-lightbox.css

wp-video-lightbox.css

65 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

sbi-styles.min.css

77 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

71 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

78 ms

nectar-slider.css

nectar-slider.css

80 ms

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

83 ms

style.css

style.css

87 ms

grid-system.css

grid-system.css

91 ms

style.css

style.css

116 ms

header-layout-menu-left-aligned.css

header-layout-menu-left-aligned.css

97 ms

element-video-lightbox.css

element-video-lightbox.css

108 ms

wpforms.css

wpforms.css

105 ms

css

css

42 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

105 ms

ascend.css

ascend.css

108 ms

menu-dynamic.css

menu-dynamic.css

121 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

132 ms

salient-dynamic-styles.css

salient-dynamic-styles.css

134 ms

style.css

style.css

130 ms

css

css

58 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

152 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

147 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

148 ms

video-lightbox.js

video-lightbox.js

165 ms

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

164 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

163 ms

js

js

100 ms

classic-10_7.css

classic-10_7.css

33 ms

mc-validate.js

mc-validate.js

58 ms

style-non-critical.css

style-non-critical.css

330 ms

magnific.css

magnific.css

331 ms

core.css

core.css

330 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

433 ms

nectar-slider.js

nectar-slider.js

456 ms

wp-disable-comments.js

wp-disable-comments.js

433 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

432 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

434 ms

priority.js

priority.js

434 ms

nectar-slider-priority.js

nectar-slider-priority.js

459 ms

transit.min.js

transit.min.js

454 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

434 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

420 ms

hoverintent.min.js

hoverintent.min.js

407 ms

magnific.js

magnific.js

427 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

426 ms

init.js

init.js

476 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

417 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

476 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

304 ms

sbi-sprite.png

sbi-sprite.png

216 ms

Signature-only.white_.png

Signature-only.white_.png

216 ms

161-optimized-webp.webp

161-optimized-webp.webp

293 ms

DSC_0170-scaled-webp.webp

DSC_0170-scaled-webp.webp

291 ms

FIRST-IMAGE_Offset_14-webp.webp

FIRST-IMAGE_Offset_14-webp.webp

296 ms

Fulfillment_0114-scaled-webp.webp

Fulfillment_0114-scaled-webp.webp

292 ms

General_5-webp.webp

General_5-webp.webp

293 ms

Offset_0043-webp.webp

Offset_0043-webp.webp

338 ms

Offset_0098-scaled-webp.webp

Offset_0098-scaled-webp.webp

294 ms

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf

135 ms

L0xhDFMnlVwD4h3Lt9JWnbX3jG-2X5XHE1ofFg.ttf

L0xhDFMnlVwD4h3Lt9JWnbX3jG-2X5XHE1ofFg.ttf

167 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

270 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

192 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

193 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

193 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

193 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

228 ms

collect

collect

67 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

25 ms

Accessibility Review

sigprint.net accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sigprint.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sigprint.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sigprint.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sigprint.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sigprint.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sigprint. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: