4.1 sec in total
154 ms
3.9 sec
101 ms
Welcome to site131.com homepage info - get ready to check SITE131 best content right away, or after learning these important things about site131.com
SITE131 in Dallas. Tomorrow's art today. Pairing emerging contemporary artists from Texas, USA, and abroad. New talent. New understandings. Free & welcoming!
Visit site131.comWe analyzed Site131.com page load time and found that the first response time was 154 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
site131.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value2.6 s
88/100
25%
Value30.8 s
0/100
10%
Value830 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.497
16/100
15%
Value9.7 s
29/100
10%
154 ms
580 ms
103 ms
212 ms
157 ms
Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (118 requests) were addressed to the original Site131.com, 2% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Timchumley.com.
Page size can be reduced by 132.4 kB (14%)
964.0 kB
831.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Site131.com main page is 964.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 503.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 122.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 135 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SITE131 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Site131.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 111 (94%)
118
7
The browser has sent 118 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SITE131. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 76 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 37 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
site131.com
154 ms
site131.com
580 ms
admin_icon.css
103 ms
dashicons.min.css
212 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
157 ms
styles.css
157 ms
uaf.css
161 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
159 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
157 ms
style.css
210 ms
font-awesome.min.css
213 ms
style.min.css
216 ms
style.css
221 ms
dripicons.css
215 ms
kiko-all.css
264 ms
font-awesome-5.min.css
267 ms
stylesheet.min.css
431 ms
print.css
273 ms
style_dynamic_callback.php
522 ms
responsive.min.css
288 ms
style_dynamic_responsive_callback.php
525 ms
js_composer.min.css
336 ms
css
38 ms
core-dashboard.min.css
334 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
358 ms
frontend.min.css
389 ms
swiper.min.css
393 ms
e-swiper.min.css
392 ms
post-2840.css
910 ms
css
37 ms
jquery.min.js
516 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
515 ms
prefixfree.min.js
519 ms
rbtools.min.js
611 ms
rs6.min.js
579 ms
html5.js
542 ms
site131.com
723 ms
css
19 ms
hustle-icons.min.css
525 ms
hustle-global.min.css
543 ms
css
20 ms
hustle-optin.min.css
579 ms
hustle-popup.min.css
542 ms
hustle-inline.min.css
495 ms
rs6.css
518 ms
core.min.js
533 ms
mouse.min.js
539 ms
resizable.min.js
548 ms
draggable.min.js
520 ms
controlgroup.min.js
735 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
732 ms
button.min.js
732 ms
dialog.min.js
729 ms
wpdialog.min.js
719 ms
hooks.min.js
684 ms
i18n.min.js
676 ms
index.js
676 ms
index.js
654 ms
hustle-ui.min.js
592 ms
underscore.min.js
591 ms
front.min.js
590 ms
fitie.js
559 ms
accordion.min.js
557 ms
menu.min.js
556 ms
dom-ready.min.js
437 ms
a11y.min.js
436 ms
autocomplete.min.js
432 ms
datepicker.min.js
432 ms
droppable.min.js
433 ms
progressbar.min.js
443 ms
selectable.min.js
422 ms
sortable.min.js
424 ms
slider.min.js
418 ms
spinner.min.js
406 ms
tooltip.min.js
447 ms
tabs.min.js
431 ms
effect.min.js
423 ms
effect-blind.min.js
418 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
392 ms
effect-clip.min.js
375 ms
effect-drop.min.js
370 ms
effect-explode.min.js
390 ms
effect-fade.min.js
366 ms
effect-fold.min.js
378 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
200 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
162 ms
effect-size.min.js
168 ms
effect-scale.min.js
203 ms
effect-shake.min.js
203 ms
effect-slide.min.js
214 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
215 ms
doubletaptogo.js
215 ms
modernizr.min.js
218 ms
jquery.appear.js
227 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
227 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
260 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
269 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
280 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
291 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
292 ms
jquery.form.min.js
291 ms
waypoints.min.js
310 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
318 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
319 ms
font
106 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
329 ms
ga.js
105 ms
skrollr.js
325 ms
TweenLite.min.js
321 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
330 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
332 ms
default_dynamic_callback.php
463 ms
default.min.js
328 ms
comment-reply.min.js
280 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
285 ms
qode-like.min.js
321 ms
site131.com
922 ms
161006121515Boxed-Regular.woff
333 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
391 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
site-131-logo-black.png
56 ms
dummy.png
342 ms
mail-opt-in-2c.png
98 ms
site-131-logo-black.png
309 ms
mail-opt-in-2c.png
256 ms
Site131-Logos-SmallUse-e1479833015895.png
1119 ms
site131.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
site131.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
site131.com SEO score
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Site131.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Site131.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
site131.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SITE131. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: