5.3 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.1 sec
101 ms
Welcome to sitebuild.co.nz homepage info - get ready to check Sitebuild best content for New Zealand right away, or after learning these important things about sitebuild.co.nz
sitebuild.co.nz Blog
Visit sitebuild.co.nzWe analyzed Sitebuild.co.nz page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
sitebuild.co.nz performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value14.3 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value160 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.193
64/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
1107 ms
719 ms
717 ms
725 ms
723 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Sitebuild.co.nz and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Sitebuild.co.nz.
Page size can be reduced by 281.1 kB (72%)
390.7 kB
109.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Sitebuild.co.nz main page is 390.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 310.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 252 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sitebuild images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 222.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 222.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitebuild.co.nz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (88%)
48
6
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sitebuild. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sitebuild.co.nz
1107 ms
style.css
719 ms
Verdana.css
717 ms
Navigator.css
725 ms
pathway.css
723 ms
ui.all.css
720 ms
jquery.min.js
1427 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
2137 ms
rvsheadpage.js
954 ms
jquery.url.js
952 ms
ddsmoothmenu.css
954 ms
ddsmoothmenu-v.css
955 ms
rvscustomopenwindow.js
1188 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
1188 ms
ui.base.css
475 ms
ui.theme.css
1509 ms
ui.core.css
241 ms
ui.resizable.css
240 ms
ui.accordion.css
241 ms
ui.dialog.css
469 ms
ui.slider.css
476 ms
ui.tabs.css
477 ms
ui.datepicker.css
477 ms
ui.progressbar.css
705 ms
spacer.gif
239 ms
mu_l.jpg
240 ms
bgmu.jpg
239 ms
black_arrow.gif
242 ms
mu_r.jpg
240 ms
bgnav_l.jpg
243 ms
line.jpg
242 ms
bg_r.jpg
475 ms
img_01.jpg
473 ms
img_02.jpg
476 ms
img_03.jpg
478 ms
img_04.jpg
479 ms
bgdybg_t.gif
480 ms
spacer.gif
480 ms
blockredbg.gif
709 ms
blockred01.gif
712 ms
bottom.jpg
470 ms
banner_free.gif
705 ms
sha02.gif
706 ms
ryf.gif
706 ms
res.gif
707 ms
ff.gif
938 ms
ex.gif
941 ms
img_05.jpg
942 ms
img_06.jpg
943 ms
sitebuild.co.nz accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
sitebuild.co.nz best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sitebuild.co.nz SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitebuild.co.nz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitebuild.co.nz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sitebuild.co.nz
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sitebuild. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: