3.3 sec in total
135 ms
2.7 sec
460 ms
Welcome to sitecare.com homepage info - get ready to check Site Care best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about sitecare.com
SiteCare is the complete site health solution for WordPress. WordPress Support, Maintenance, and Optimization services.
Visit sitecare.comWe analyzed Sitecare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
sitecare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value880 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value17.4 s
4/100
10%
135 ms
233 ms
188 ms
211 ms
203 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Sitecare.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Player.vimeo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Sitecare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 192.5 kB (30%)
645.0 kB
452.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Sitecare.com main page is 645.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 222.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 178.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 963 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Site Care images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitecare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (68%)
72
23
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Site Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sitecare.com
135 ms
sitecare.com
233 ms
gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css
188 ms
gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css
211 ms
gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css
203 ms
style.min.css
199 ms
core-button.css
197 ms
style.min.css
368 ms
core-navigation.css
384 ms
style.min.css
403 ms
style-index.css
374 ms
core-columns.css
444 ms
gravityforms-form.css
567 ms
common.min.css
542 ms
style.css
598 ms
view.js
568 ms
view.js
593 ms
jquery.min.js
636 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
707 ms
jquery.json.min.js
747 ms
gravityforms.min.js
754 ms
utils.min.js
727 ms
view.min.js
759 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
688 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
863 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
876 ms
dom-ready.min.js
942 ms
hooks.min.js
927 ms
i18n.min.js
924 ms
a11y.min.js
928 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
1041 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
1059 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
1110 ms
index.js
1130 ms
player.js
36 ms
gtm4wp-vimeo.js
1105 ms
elements.css
565 ms
topnav.css
642 ms
blockStyles.css
654 ms
forms.css
724 ms
highlights.css
731 ms
utilities.css
718 ms
testimonials.css
776 ms
footer.css
850 ms
gtm.js
86 ms
wp-polyfill-importmap.min.js
245 ms
js
77 ms
insight.min.js
29 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
138 ms
Logo.svg
184 ms
sitecare-full-logo.svg
181 ms
wp-engine.svg
173 ms
saturady-evening-post.png
202 ms
flywheel.svg
184 ms
pagely.svg
177 ms
bodyarmor-logo.png
354 ms
godaddy.svg
228 ms
malware.svg
347 ms
performance.svg
401 ms
wordpress-pros.svg
351 ms
optimizing.svg
405 ms
quick-support.svg
442 ms
google.svg
559 ms
sitecare-promise-2-1024x698.jpg
476 ms
matthew-eads.jpg
613 ms
faceook.svg
604 ms
instagram.svg
582 ms
linkedin-2.svg
620 ms
twitter.svg
654 ms
3483368.js
106 ms
fbevents.js
22 ms
3483368.js
120 ms
banner.js
77 ms
fb.js
43 ms
sitecare.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
sitecare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sitecare.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitecare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitecare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sitecare.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Site Care. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: