5.8 sec in total
178 ms
2.6 sec
3 sec
Visit sitetrafficcontrol.com now to see the best up-to-date Sitetrafficcontrol content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sitetrafficcontrol.com
Visit sitetrafficcontrol.comWe analyzed Sitetrafficcontrol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
sitetrafficcontrol.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value102.7 s
0/100
25%
Value35.4 s
0/100
10%
Value3,120 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value60.2 s
0/100
10%
178 ms
424 ms
76 ms
146 ms
277 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Sitetrafficcontrol.com, 12% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Sitetrafficcontrol.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (12%)
22.1 MB
19.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Sitetrafficcontrol.com main page is 22.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 21.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 102.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sitetrafficcontrol needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.4 MB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 60.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.9 kB or 23% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitetrafficcontrol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (77%)
56
13
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sitetrafficcontrol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sitetrafficcontrol.com
178 ms
sitetrafficcontrol.com
424 ms
style.min.css
76 ms
styles.css
146 ms
portfolio.css
277 ms
style.css
210 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
215 ms
grid-system.css
223 ms
style.css
290 ms
header-layout-centered-menu.css
226 ms
element-testimonial.css
284 ms
element-fancy-box.css
285 ms
element-cascading-images.css
303 ms
cf7.css
303 ms
css
32 ms
responsive.css
342 ms
skin-material.css
348 ms
menu-dynamic.css
353 ms
widget-nectar-posts.css
357 ms
js_composer.min.css
359 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
367 ms
css
32 ms
breeze-prefetch-links.min.js
404 ms
jquery.min.js
487 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
422 ms
style-non-critical.css
421 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
423 ms
core.css
432 ms
slide-out-right-hover.css
472 ms
index.js
532 ms
index.js
533 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
533 ms
isotope.min.js
536 ms
salient-portfolio.js
667 ms
salient-social.js
668 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
668 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
668 ms
priority.js
668 ms
transit.min.js
669 ms
waypoints.js
668 ms
hoverintent.min.js
603 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
539 ms
anime.min.js
474 ms
superfish.js
467 ms
init.js
524 ms
touchswipe.min.js
487 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
432 ms
1cmyk-01-1-Edited.png
341 ms
8c5b898b-f97a-4e1c-b824-3f374258d8a5.png
203 ms
e64176c5-8926-406a-9e0e-207f234b240b-1.png
477 ms
5dec5231-16bf-4394-9e0d-270cafc62368-e1695130785861.png
252 ms
plusthis-500px.png
339 ms
Untitled-design-35.png
340 ms
1200px-Logo_of_Keap_Company.svg_.png
308 ms
Untitled-design-36.png
654 ms
1cmykblack-01.png
588 ms
2-2-bw2-3-with-bleed.pdf-e1695099430384.png
1414 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
32 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
75 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5alOqEp2jg.ttf
75 ms
5aUz9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7VptuA.ttf
78 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
320 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
52 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
51 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
52 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
49 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
71 ms
sitetrafficcontrol.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sitetrafficcontrol.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
sitetrafficcontrol.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitetrafficcontrol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitetrafficcontrol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sitetrafficcontrol.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sitetrafficcontrol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: