14.1 sec in total
634 ms
13.2 sec
213 ms
Visit siteworth.id now to see the best up-to-date Site Worth content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about siteworth.id
Get complete Website Stats, Traffic Stats, Search Engines Index Stats, Website Safety Stats, SEO Stats, Social Media Stats, Domain Info & Web Server Info
Visit siteworth.idWe analyzed Siteworth.id page load time and found that the first response time was 634 ms and then it took 13.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
siteworth.id performance score
634 ms
87 ms
62 ms
64 ms
95 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Siteworth.id, 30% (20 requests) were made to Google.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Cdn1.bnr2.revdepo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (12.5 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 343.0 kB (55%)
626.4 kB
283.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Siteworth.id main page is 626.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 239.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Site Worth images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 140.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.9 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 152.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Siteworth.id needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 152.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (74%)
58
15
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Site Worth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
siteworth.id
634 ms
bootstrap.min.css
87 ms
font-awesome.min.css
62 ms
style.css
64 ms
banners
95 ms
banners
93 ms
echo.min.js
38 ms
jquery.1.9.1.min.js
110 ms
bootstrap.min.js
78 ms
jquery-cookie.js
77 ms
ajaxQ.js
78 ms
javascript.php
126 ms
css
34 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
sdk.js
166 ms
favicons
757 ms
background.jpg
112 ms
logo.png
71 ms
large_logo.png
95 ms
favicons
519 ms
favicons
911 ms
favicons
10036 ms
favicons
694 ms
favicons
1116 ms
favicons
1547 ms
favicons
1485 ms
favicons
1177 ms
favicons
4526 ms
favicons
1151 ms
favicons
1206 ms
favicons
2447 ms
favicons
4554 ms
favicons
3328 ms
favicons
1893 ms
favicons
3054 ms
favicons
2484 ms
favicons
12509 ms
favicons
3575 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
60 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
60 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
60 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
60 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
60 ms
bnr-tag_1.0.9.js
57 ms
banners
113 ms
banners
83 ms
collect
43 ms
20160319_015064378_image-banner.cib
96 ms
20160319_015064263_image-banner.cib
380 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
94 ms
bounce-tag_1.0.23.js
8 ms
rhpop_1.1.42.js
11 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
132 ms
xd_arbiter.php
148 ms
xd_arbiter.php
271 ms
bnrcore_1.0.30.js
2 ms
findBanner
37 ms
findBanner
85 ms
39.css
3 ms
39.gif
3 ms
findBanner
37 ms
findBanner
73 ms
62.css
8 ms
62.gif
4 ms
reloadChat.php
111 ms
reloadChat.php
116 ms
siteworth.id SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Siteworth.id can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Siteworth.id main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
siteworth.id
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Site Worth. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: