1.4 sec in total
271 ms
646 ms
517 ms
Welcome to siteworthcheck.com homepage info - get ready to check Siteworthcheck best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about siteworthcheck.com
HD Wallpaper cristmas
Visit siteworthcheck.comWe analyzed Siteworthcheck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
siteworthcheck.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.077
95/100
15%
Value6.5 s
58/100
10%
271 ms
21 ms
43 ms
29 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Siteworthcheck.com, 24% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to S10.histats.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (271 ms) belongs to the original domain Siteworthcheck.com.
Page size can be reduced by 485.2 kB (38%)
1.3 MB
781.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Siteworthcheck.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 751.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Siteworthcheck needs image optimization as it can save up to 100.3 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 161.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 161.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 156.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Siteworthcheck.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 156.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (36%)
28
18
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Siteworthcheck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
siteworthcheck.com
271 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
21 ms
bootstrap.min.css
43 ms
style.css
29 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.3.0.min.js
24 ms
jquery.js
36 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
28 ms
css
25 ms
facebook-template-8svhggxe-30rcaxmv4ed1w9ablvg4xs.jpg
10 ms
letter-template-mmvpdgdh-30rcax9alirhk41pg9w64g.png
36 ms
mla-format-template-5k4lxrgy-30rcawmoe23jnvbcixyw3k.jpg
18 ms
wanted-poster-template-t7copqbs-30rcawmoe23jnvbcixyw3k.jpg
32 ms
memo-template-fkkejhbi-30rcaw026lflrmkzlm1m2o.jpg
19 ms
avery-5160-template-xvkcictc-30r34kt012kewj2ljrc5xc.jpg
11 ms
swot-analysis-template-2016-unxcha87-30r34kawnwfnsc340alji8.png
51 ms
budget-template-2016-basmv0qf-30r34j6739myrwd9jhxn28.gif
31 ms
bootstrap-templates-2016-dtkzgjae-30r34ix5eokl7svirrkbuo.jpg
13 ms
free-calendar-template-2016-swfckpz6-30r34iaj77wnbk55ufn1ts.jpg
15 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
26 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTaRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
170 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
189 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzKRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
188 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
188 ms
js15.js
5 ms
jsscript.min.js
32 ms
rating.js
15 ms
custom.main.js
14 ms
wp-embed.min.js
15 ms
what-date-is-easter-this-year-xnvcln0z-30iytyl27leami6srya3uy.png
16 ms
christmas-2015-breaks-afhjsxfn-308j036uwqoc6ilryfi80a.png
17 ms
when-is-easter-this-year-2014-6tgnnian-30iytzprs86zmxwn8qy0ay.png
18 ms
3229945.php
7 ms
cc_402.js
143 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBrrIa-7acMAeDBVuclsi6Gc.woff
25 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxvR_54zmj3SbGZQh3vCOwvY.woff
9 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxuw_rQOTGi-AJs5XCWaKIhU.woff
24 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxhbnBKKEOwRKgsHDreGcocg.woff
23 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxsBo4hlZyBvkZICS3KpNonM.woff
25 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
24 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
24 ms
all.js
147 ms
siteworthcheck.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
siteworthcheck.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
siteworthcheck.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
LA
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Siteworthcheck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Latin is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Siteworthcheck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
siteworthcheck.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Siteworthcheck. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: