9.3 sec in total
284 ms
8.2 sec
849 ms
Welcome to sixley.com homepage info - get ready to check Sixley best content right away, or after learning these important things about sixley.com
Sixley helps businesses find great hires, recommended by people they trust. As a thank you, half of our fee goes to recommenders or their chosen charities.
Visit sixley.comWe analyzed Sixley.com page load time and found that the first response time was 284 ms and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
sixley.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value15.7 s
0/100
10%
Value2,130 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.022
100/100
15%
Value26.8 s
0/100
10%
284 ms
1455 ms
69 ms
206 ms
227 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Sixley.com, 13% (12 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Sixley.com.
Page size can be reduced by 390.9 kB (19%)
2.1 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Sixley.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 128.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sixley images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 138.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.9 kB or 30% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sixley.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 28% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (71%)
85
25
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sixley. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sixley.com
284 ms
sixley.com
1455 ms
gtm.js
69 ms
default
206 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
227 ms
style.min.css
369 ms
styles.css
335 ms
css
32 ms
style.css
450 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
393 ms
frontend.min.css
497 ms
swiper.min.css
382 ms
post-455.css
472 ms
frontend.min.css
667 ms
pum-site-styles.css
504 ms
jvcf7_client.css
530 ms
general.min.css
582 ms
css
60 ms
jquery.min.js
743 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
641 ms
input-mask.js
715 ms
axios.js
645 ms
linkedin-id.js
699 ms
insight.js
766 ms
main.js
779 ms
index.js
831 ms
index.js
850 ms
page-scroll-to-id.min.js
865 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
859 ms
navigation.js
884 ms
global.js
904 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
923 ms
core.min.js
991 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
945 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
944 ms
jvcf7_validation.js
936 ms
general.min.js
958 ms
5251459.js
85 ms
css
13 ms
insight.min.js
81 ms
image-from-rawpixel-id-217350-jpeg.jpg
5518 ms
logo-dark.svg
341 ms
logo-light.svg
345 ms
landing-background-image-2020.png
2115 ms
scroll-btn-dark.svg
342 ms
big-dot-line.svg
365 ms
tablet-watch.svg
596 ms
watch.svg
453 ms
g-lemon.svg
468 ms
dotted-line.svg
480 ms
yellow-check.svg
568 ms
green-check.svg
591 ms
blue-check.svg
605 ms
red-check.svg
678 ms
landing-smartphone.svg
703 ms
copybook-black.svg
745 ms
book-2.svg
722 ms
g-lemon-2.svg
797 ms
glasses-full.svg
842 ms
partner-1.png
844 ms
partner-2.png
853 ms
check-icon.svg
911 ms
sticker.svg
963 ms
449584752
186 ms
notepad.svg
921 ms
u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf
29 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l521wRZWMf_.ttf
51 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZWMf_.ttf
72 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52_wFZWMf_.ttf
72 ms
AvenirNext-Bold.ttf
1142 ms
Merriweather-Regular.ttf
1277 ms
AvenirNext-Medium.ttf
1331 ms
uc.js
45 ms
AvenirNextCyr-Bold-3.woff
1127 ms
ruler.svg
1201 ms
laptop.svg
1250 ms
0.jpg
1519 ms
twitter.svg
1241 ms
linkedin.svg
1269 ms
1454713889-cb0d28e5affc2eead01ced2dd7533f6119272375fb9d33be5f4f856ac74e78a1-d
37 ms
5251459.js
117 ms
banner.js
63 ms
collectedforms.js
51 ms
449584752
95 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
57 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
66 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
58 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
189 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
186 ms
twk-main.js
29 ms
twk-vendor.js
41 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
57 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
89 ms
twk-runtime.js
74 ms
twk-app.js
71 ms
sixley.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
sixley.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
sixley.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sixley.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sixley.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sixley.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sixley. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: