Tools & Wizards About Us
sixpacktech.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

260 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

sixpacktech.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sixpacktech content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sixpacktech.com

Visit sixpacktech.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sixpacktech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 260 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sixpacktech.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,940 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sixpacktech.com

260 ms

style.css

121 ms

polls-css.css

125 ms

jetpack.css

126 ms

jquery.js

191 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Sixpacktech.com, 23% (18 requests) were made to Youtube-nocookie.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (664 ms) belongs to the original domain Sixpacktech.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 624.6 kB (46%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

728.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sixpacktech.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 563.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 71.5 kB

  • Original 88.6 kB
  • After minification 84.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 63.8 kB

  • Original 563.1 kB
  • After minification 499.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sixpacktech needs image optimization as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 207.2 kB

  • Original 360.5 kB
  • After minification 360.2 kB
  • After compression 153.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 207.2 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 282.0 kB

  • Original 340.5 kB
  • After minification 328.9 kB
  • After compression 58.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sixpacktech.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 282.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (31%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

52

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sixpacktech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sixpacktech.com

sixpacktech.com

260 ms

style.css

style.css

121 ms

polls-css.css

polls-css.css

125 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

126 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

191 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

137 ms

external-tracking.min.js

external-tracking.min.js

137 ms

polls-js.js

polls-js.js

126 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

6 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

62 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

129 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

129 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

6 ms

ga.js

ga.js

64 ms

tAgmc-Et02A

tAgmc-Et02A

145 ms

bYzqf0Ukssg

bYzqf0Ukssg

147 ms

CashAq5RToM

CashAq5RToM

148 ms

LNMxQ4jV9io

LNMxQ4jV9io

154 ms

WikDVpFLnsw

WikDVpFLnsw

153 ms

exVHXLTzlfY

exVHXLTzlfY

147 ms

lrPBKeCmFK0

lrPBKeCmFK0

289 ms

umEuqbgVOR8

umEuqbgVOR8

297 ms

qp0WBiME_fM

qp0WBiME_fM

313 ms

7CDMjCoytcc

7CDMjCoytcc

311 ms

P974Kdmz0Xo

P974Kdmz0Xo

319 ms

Fl1AltQjPoQ

Fl1AltQjPoQ

364 ms

3PPhyBUsxaA

3PPhyBUsxaA

346 ms

KjBTrFiPtgw

KjBTrFiPtgw

387 ms

eCgVgaEYFAM

eCgVgaEYFAM

362 ms

wvQnpPA8AmQ

wvQnpPA8AmQ

372 ms

mbBaGW9N1o0

mbBaGW9N1o0

396 ms

yhJS5CqYJpM

yhJS5CqYJpM

408 ms

btn_donate_LG.gif

btn_donate_LG.gif

99 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

92 ms

cropped-spt07-2.png

cropped-spt07-2.png

409 ms

Cover-outside-150x129.jpg

Cover-outside-150x129.jpg

127 ms

Cover-inside-150x127.jpg

Cover-inside-150x127.jpg

263 ms

Screen-Shot-2016-03-19-at-8.45.14-PM-350x168.jpg

Screen-Shot-2016-03-19-at-8.45.14-PM-350x168.jpg

134 ms

CNL-bottle-100x150.jpg

CNL-bottle-100x150.jpg

128 ms

Screen-Shot-2016-03-19-at-9.06.41-PM-150x126.jpg

Screen-Shot-2016-03-19-at-9.06.41-PM-150x126.jpg

261 ms

2-man-saw-150x46.jpg

2-man-saw-150x46.jpg

354 ms

CNL-foam-101x150.jpg

CNL-foam-101x150.jpg

367 ms

CNL-yeast-350x282.jpg

CNL-yeast-350x282.jpg

407 ms

CNL-glass-350x338.jpg

CNL-glass-350x338.jpg

407 ms

Avery-Collaboration-not-Litigation-150x135.jpg

Avery-Collaboration-not-Litigation-150x135.jpg

415 ms

ps01-2.jpg

ps01-2.jpg

407 ms

Klein-150x142.jpg

Klein-150x142.jpg

406 ms

j01-2.jpg

j01-2.jpg

503 ms

6pak1.thumbnail.jpg

6pak1.thumbnail.jpg

500 ms

New-SPT-sticker-450x87.jpg

New-SPT-sticker-450x87.jpg

502 ms

NBCF.jpg

NBCF.jpg

500 ms

Small-Old-Car.jpg

Small-Old-Car.jpg

502 ms

MASH-logo.jpg

MASH-logo.jpg

574 ms

p160320.jpg

p160320.jpg

571 ms

five-stars.jpg

five-stars.jpg

572 ms

four-stars.jpg

four-stars.jpg

573 ms

three-stars.jpg

three-stars.jpg

573 ms

two-stars.jpg

two-stars.jpg

573 ms

one-star.jpg

one-star.jpg

660 ms

f160320.jpg

f160320.jpg

662 ms

b160320.jpg

b160320.jpg

662 ms

v160320.jpg

v160320.jpg

663 ms

bw160320.jpg

bw160320.jpg

663 ms

n160320.jpg

n160320.jpg

664 ms

wordpress.png

wordpress.png

639 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

21 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

counter.js

counter.js

13 ms

t.php

t.php

175 ms

g.gif

g.gif

18 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

65 ms

services.css

services.css

189 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

23 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

63 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

198 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

190 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

30 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

31 ms

Accessibility Review

sixpacktech.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sixpacktech.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

sixpacktech.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sixpacktech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Sixpacktech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sixpacktech.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sixpacktech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: