1.4 sec in total
33 ms
855 ms
547 ms
Click here to check amazing Six Sigma content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sixsigma.com
Information about Six Sigma, including Lean Six Sigma training, Six Sigma certification, Lean Six Sigma consulting, and much more.
Visit sixsigma.comWe analyzed Sixsigma.com page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
sixsigma.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value4.8 s
30/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.459
19/100
15%
Value6.1 s
63/100
10%
33 ms
58 ms
35 ms
17 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Sixsigma.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (288 ms) relates to the external source Youtube.com.
Page size can be reduced by 652.1 kB (59%)
1.1 MB
456.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Sixsigma.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 466.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Six Sigma images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 299.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 299.5 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 305.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sixsigma.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 305.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (50%)
44
22
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Six Sigma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sixsigma.com
33 ms
www.sixsigma.com
58 ms
css
35 ms
style.css
17 ms
ddsmoothmenu.css
30 ms
jquery.min.js
43 ms
footer_move.js
31 ms
wdsb.css
30 ms
jquery.js
81 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
30 ms
gf.placeholders.js
33 ms
wdsb.js
34 ms
formreset.min.css
34 ms
formsmain.min.css
39 ms
readyclass.min.css
39 ms
browsers.min.css
39 ms
jquery.json.js
38 ms
gravityforms.min.js
74 ms
conditional_logic.min.js
68 ms
wp-embed.min.js
67 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
131 ms
ga.js
109 ms
six-sigma-bg-180kb.jpg
251 ms
nav_bar_bg.png
23 ms
six-sigma-certification-cta.png
32 ms
content_left_bg_01.png
34 ms
content_left_bg_02.png
35 ms
content_left_bg_04.png
35 ms
black_trans_bg.png
242 ms
social_icon01.png
241 ms
social_icon02.png
240 ms
social_icon03.png
241 ms
form_header_bg.png
240 ms
form_bg.png
244 ms
form_contact_button_bg.png
243 ms
lock-icon.png
244 ms
form_footer_bg.png
243 ms
ajax-loader.gif
242 ms
menu.png
245 ms
input_bg.png
246 ms
oakJiqgNyXGIQSR0uuZQBw.ttf
231 ms
TJBgbd7QSbnZkQrnM77kmw.ttf
229 ms
5_80veqYtMg_mX_C_gEF_PesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
228 ms
_iDTZSnkWsw
288 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
36 ms
www-embed-player.js
59 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
72 ms
ad_status.js
67 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
113 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
114 ms
sixsigma.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
sixsigma.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
sixsigma.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sixsigma.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sixsigma.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sixsigma.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Six Sigma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: