2.4 sec in total
373 ms
1.7 sec
341 ms
Welcome to skinhampshire.com homepage info - get ready to check Skinhampshire best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about skinhampshire.com
Consult the leading skin clinic for Wrinkle reduction treatment in Basingstoke, Dermal Fillers, injections & skin treatments.
Visit skinhampshire.comWe analyzed Skinhampshire.com page load time and found that the first response time was 373 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
skinhampshire.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value6.4 s
9/100
25%
Value35.6 s
0/100
10%
Value38,170 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.698
7/100
15%
Value58.8 s
0/100
10%
373 ms
84 ms
153 ms
150 ms
151 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Skinhampshire.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (566 ms) belongs to the original domain Skinhampshire.com.
Page size can be reduced by 452.4 kB (51%)
882.7 kB
430.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Skinhampshire.com main page is 882.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 432.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Skinhampshire images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 290.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 290.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Skinhampshire.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (73%)
66
18
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Skinhampshire. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.skinhampshire.com
373 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
84 ms
styles.css
153 ms
typography.css
150 ms
layout.css
151 ms
style.css
154 ms
prettyPhoto.css
164 ms
css
40 ms
superfish.css
167 ms
skebggallery.css
223 ms
skebgvideo.css
224 ms
jetpack.css
226 ms
wp-about-author.css
234 ms
jquery.js
329 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
256 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
296 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
298 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
300 ms
custom.js
299 ms
superfish.js
327 ms
hcsticky.js
369 ms
skebggallery.js
372 ms
video.min.js
449 ms
skebgvideo.js
374 ms
jquery.tubular.1.0.js
408 ms
vimeo.player.js
408 ms
platform.js
103 ms
photon.js
441 ms
jquery.form.min.js
443 ms
scripts.js
447 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
25 ms
gprofiles.js
78 ms
wpgroho.js
496 ms
comment-reply.min.js
496 ms
core.min.js
514 ms
widget.min.js
531 ms
mouse.min.js
533 ms
slider.min.js
534 ms
wp-embed.min.js
566 ms
e-201611.js
23 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
collect
30 ms
iframe_api
37 ms
skinhampshire240.png
233 ms
customers-love-us-2.png
234 ms
Visa-icon.png
231 ms
maestro.png
30 ms
skinhampshire.png
231 ms
header-bg.png
223 ms
facebook.png
223 ms
twitter.png
224 ms
google_plus.png
226 ms
nav-bdr.png
227 ms
contact-bdr.png
233 ms
head-toggle.png
232 ms
container-bg.png
232 ms
iStock_000021403155Large-min.jpg
565 ms
mastercard.png
28 ms
Paypal-icon.png
27 ms
01.png
208 ms
AKu1CjQ4qnV8MUltkAX3sFBI1aZvkJLeFEwcwXkBYq0.ttf
17 ms
6LmGj5dOJopQKEkt88GowQNd2zpumJ3ZXdYPaAdqT7w.ttf
34 ms
nAqt4hiqwq3tzCecpgPmVZK-EqCRAgJ4DGsxXn5jo_s.ttf
36 ms
3Mz4hOHzs2npRMG3B1ascbearE5_VzBcjtDoaNr3b3c.ttf
39 ms
www-widgetapi.js
8 ms
hovercard.css
32 ms
services.css
56 ms
menu_close.png
82 ms
minus.png
75 ms
progress.gif
75 ms
g.gif
22 ms
skinhampshire.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
skinhampshire.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
skinhampshire.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Skinhampshire.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Skinhampshire.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
skinhampshire.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Skinhampshire. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: