Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

skyscanner.net

Skyscanner

Page Load Speed

854 ms in total

First Response

155 ms

Resources Loaded

629 ms

Page Rendered

70 ms

skyscanner.net screenshot

About Website

Visit skyscanner.net now to see the best up-to-date Skyscanner content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about skyscanner.net

Visit skyscanner.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Skyscanner.net page load time and found that the first response time was 155 ms and then it took 699 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

skyscanner.net performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,710 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.123

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

skyscanner.net

155 ms

skyscanner.net

286 ms

www.skyscanner.net

165 ms

index.html

11 ms

main.652acd39.js

9 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Skyscanner.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (286 ms) belongs to the original domain Skyscanner.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 297 B (0%)

Content Size

81.4 kB

After Optimization

81.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Skyscanner.net main page is 81.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 80.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 297 B

  • Original 708 B
  • After minification 708 B
  • After compression 411 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 297 B or 42% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 80.7 kB
  • After minification 80.7 kB
  • After compression 80.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Skyscanner. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

skyscanner.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

skyscanner.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

skyscanner.net SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Skyscanner.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Skyscanner.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Skyscanner. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: