14.8 sec in total
1.6 sec
12.8 sec
424 ms
Visit sleepingduck.com now to see the best up-to-date Sleeping Duck content for Australia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sleepingduck.com
The new way to buy your mattress that ensures peace of mind on comfort and support with unsurpassed quality and value.
Visit sleepingduck.comWe analyzed Sleepingduck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 13.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
sleepingduck.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value15.3 s
0/100
25%
Value17.4 s
0/100
10%
Value20,350 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.093
91/100
15%
Value29.4 s
0/100
10%
1581 ms
684 ms
523 ms
1306 ms
1542 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Sleepingduck.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Static.olark.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to 721-events.olark.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Sleepingduck.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (68%)
2.0 MB
656.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Sleepingduck.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sleeping Duck images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sleepingduck.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (74%)
77
20
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sleeping Duck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sleepingduck.com
1581 ms
684 ms
cb1c1749cbbbb78648069e99f596f562.css
523 ms
4bc964ae865454d3277f9823f312bf9c.css
1306 ms
2ada385eef04a4c02d6a51a5deaea783.css
1542 ms
45b3dda42391b95ad79a700ba85db543.css
1660 ms
e0ce73f9ede756692c44dc9094f68a87.css
1115 ms
bc3c0f8306ec1f5a2e3ed32a29399f52.css
2105 ms
8eab6a62d5266389c7436b05f13d3850.css
1042 ms
661367086b68606e6ce37ca250fb8f8c.css
1560 ms
76e5aca92592171f640e47a4216b0ebd.css
1633 ms
503c24ed5f2cb4b417bf3f34b76ff742.css
1819 ms
f29f7b51debe54e0f0223165be073b42.css
2051 ms
6780e5cbb49ed0e7dbb71d7f998465f4.css
2088 ms
44998dd4744475c32db49551f24d8423.css
2137 ms
fb053f90e9c976fc146d01851b605f4d.css
2178 ms
882d1ba7ccc4b75eb03d06d886192b81.css
2338 ms
e5fbd90c8abb2f270421560a6fa2bb4f.css
2580 ms
ewayrapid.css
2609 ms
prototype.js
2621 ms
ccard.js
2667 ms
validation.js
2686 ms
builder.js
2850 ms
effects.js
3090 ms
dragdrop.js
3117 ms
controls.js
3144 ms
slider.js
3175 ms
js.js
3202 ms
form.js
3368 ms
iwd-jquery-2.1.3.min.js
3607 ms
modal.js
3408 ms
eCrypt.js
3641 ms
ewayrapid.js
3691 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
3718 ms
jquery.validation.min.js
3631 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
3920 ms
modernizr-custom.js
4126 ms
css
25 ms
parsley.min.js
4151 ms
application.js
3652 ms
checkout.js
3171 ms
footer.js
3127 ms
home.js
3145 ms
mattress.js
3119 ms
page.js
3117 ms
reviews.js
2806 ms
analytics.js
67 ms
gtm.js
81 ms
logo.png
1887 ms
talent-still.jpg
1259 ms
arrow.png
2231 ms
star.png
2209 ms
product-review-logo.png
1936 ms
100-night-guarantee.png
1136 ms
story.png
2170 ms
bed.png
1524 ms
social.png
2535 ms
logo-dark.png
2895 ms
loader0.js
161 ms
main.js
537 ms
AvertaExtraBold.woff
3870 ms
AvertaLight.woff
4140 ms
collect
23 ms
bat.js
39 ms
fbevents.js
128 ms
collect
61 ms
ga-audiences
56 ms
1388-192-10-5133.js
60 ms
92 ms
c
126 ms
update.html
116 ms
blips
196 ms
config
125 ms
application2.js
189 ms
blips
258 ms
storage.html
124 ms
storage.js
30 ms
visits
172 ms
2ac6d2f24e1413de3ba9e5430535f591.css
69 ms
s
61 ms
buttons-light.png
61 ms
log.png
95 ms
s
44 ms
s
45 ms
nr-885.min.js
19 ms
sleepingduck.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
sleepingduck.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
sleepingduck.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sleepingduck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sleepingduck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sleepingduck.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sleeping Duck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: