14.1 sec in total
3.4 sec
9.7 sec
1.1 sec
Visit slimlife.pro now to see the best up-to-date Slimlife content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about slimlife.pro
Visit slimlife.proWe analyzed Slimlife.pro page load time and found that the first response time was 3.4 sec and then it took 10.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
slimlife.pro performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value4.9 s
64/100
10%
Value470 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
3387 ms
199 ms
371 ms
385 ms
375 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Slimlife.pro, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Slimlife.pro.
Page size can be reduced by 994.0 kB (54%)
1.9 MB
857.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Slimlife.pro main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 681.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Slimlife images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 362.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 362.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 549.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slimlife.pro needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 549.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (72%)
76
21
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slimlife. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
slimlife.pro
3387 ms
system.base.css
199 ms
system.messages.css
371 ms
simplenews.css
385 ms
comment.css
375 ms
field.css
376 ms
node.css
405 ms
poll.css
568 ms
search.css
571 ms
forum.css
1069 ms
views.css
577 ms
ckeditor.css
575 ms
ctools.css
752 ms
panels.css
754 ms
font-awesome.min.css
282 ms
bootstrap.css
767 ms
base.css
761 ms
default.css
1766 ms
compatibility.css
1423 ms
md-slider.css
1551 ms
md-slider-home-page-slider-layers.css
989 ms
md-slider-style.css
1196 ms
flexible.css
1222 ms
cacc51c681bdfec7bac461b543441cbf.css
1393 ms
template.css
1402 ms
bootstrap.css
1569 ms
Slim.css
1698 ms
owl.carousel.css
1566 ms
owl.transitions.css
1582 ms
prettyPhoto.css
1673 ms
font-awesome.css
1702 ms
animate.css
1706 ms
sliderlayer.css
1704 ms
font.css
1806 ms
css
392 ms
jquery.min.js
2248 ms
jquery.once.js
1843 ms
drupal.js
1856 ms
ru_AaQtIUmMGCGqCRtG57JW3G6VAvxY4si6N3jErNdWHOw.js
1852 ms
tb-megamenu-frontend.js
1715 ms
tb-megamenu-touch.js
1616 ms
jquery.touchwipe.js
1643 ms
modernizr.js
1660 ms
jquery.easing.js
1653 ms
md-slider.js
1950 ms
owl.carousel.js
2669 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1684 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
1901 ms
wow.min.js
1677 ms
jquery.appear.js
1720 ms
count-to.js
1710 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
1755 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1628 ms
jpreloader.min.js
1607 ms
bootstrap.js
1477 ms
imagesloader.min.js
1449 ms
theme.plugins.js
1308 ms
dr-butin-1_1.jpg
1014 ms
slim-life-logo3.png
401 ms
slim-life-slider-bg-2.jpg
1573 ms
bg-title.png
398 ms
bg-v2.jpg
2913 ms
bg-title-white.png
398 ms
bg-portfolio-v3.png
395 ms
%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%A0%D1%8B%D0%B1%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0.jpg
401 ms
%D0%A0%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD.jpg
404 ms
%D0%A7%D1%83%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0-%D0%AE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%8F.jpg
402 ms
%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0-%D0%9B%D1%8E%D0%B4%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B0.jpg
403 ms
dasha.png
611 ms
30_principles_of_harmony.jpg
611 ms
how_to_lose_weight_forever.jpg
670 ms
all_nutrition_in_three_words.jpg
780 ms
sdk.js
369 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTfOEPOIfcPv-fZ-WyMUtx48.ttf
139 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1068 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
138 ms
Fl4y0QdOxyyTHEGMXX8kcaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
138 ms
rB9EtQHnJI9-9iLCzVr5P_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
196 ms
oHi30kwQWvpCWqAhzHcCSKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
194 ms
279 ms
xd_arbiter.php
348 ms
xd_arbiter.php
662 ms
testimonial-quote.png
184 ms
slimlife.pro accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
slimlife.pro best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
slimlife.pro SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slimlife.pro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Slimlife.pro main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
slimlife.pro
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slimlife. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: