4.8 sec in total
1.3 sec
3.4 sec
171 ms
Visit smcpexamples.com now to see the best up-to-date SMCP Examples content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about smcpexamples.com
Learn SMCP phrases by examples and bring your communication skills to perfection. Listen, play and learn with us. It's free of charge.
Visit smcpexamples.comWe analyzed Smcpexamples.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
smcpexamples.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.1 s
0/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value12.1 s
3/100
10%
Value680 ms
44/100
30%
Value0.052
99/100
15%
Value15.7 s
6/100
10%
1273 ms
42 ms
326 ms
427 ms
528 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Smcpexamples.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Smcpexamples.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (71%)
1.6 MB
466.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Smcpexamples.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 846.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SMCP Examples images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 540.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 540.4 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 512.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smcpexamples.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 512.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (83%)
48
8
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SMCP Examples. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
smcpexamples.com
1273 ms
simple-line-icons.css
42 ms
k2.css
326 ms
font-awesome.min.css
427 ms
animate.min.css
528 ms
sppagebuilder.css
637 ms
sppagecontainer.css
330 ms
magnific-popup.css
329 ms
css
30 ms
font-awesome.min.css
441 ms
bootstrap-blue.css
758 ms
template.css
443 ms
yjsgmenus.css
536 ms
layout.css
555 ms
blue.css
554 ms
yjresponsive.css
640 ms
custom_responsive.css
647 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
668 ms
jquery.min.js
774 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
747 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
746 ms
k2.frontend.js
762 ms
core.js
780 ms
interaction.js
856 ms
sppagebuilder.js
858 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
868 ms
mootools-core.js
970 ms
mootools-more.js
997 ms
yjsg.jquicustom.min.js
893 ms
bootstrap.min.js
969 ms
yjsg.site.plugins.js
971 ms
yjsg.site.js
982 ms
yjsg.responsive.js
1007 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1183 ms
froogaloop2.min.js
1081 ms
yjsg.magnific.popup.min.js
1082 ms
yjsg.panels.js
1096 ms
adsbygoogle.js
54 ms
normalize.css
677 ms
yjsg_layout.css
789 ms
newsitems.css
752 ms
typo.css
756 ms
logo.png
125 ms
part-a.jpg
125 ms
part-b.jpg
124 ms
ga.js
72 ms
font
24 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
235 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
223 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
collect
27 ms
ga-audiences
28 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
117 ms
smcpexamples.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
smcpexamples.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
smcpexamples.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smcpexamples.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smcpexamples.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
smcpexamples.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SMCP Examples. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: