Tools & Wizards About Us
smile.one screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

smile.one

Smile.One - (Brazil) | Créditos de Jogos e Serviços

Page Load Speed

354 ms in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

324 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

smile.one screenshot

About Website

Welcome to smile.one homepage info - get ready to check Smile best content for Indonesia right away, or after learning these important things about smile.one

Diamantes mais baratos para seus jogos favoritos, entrega super rápida, vários métodos de pagamento e suporte online.

Visit smile.one

Key Findings

We analyzed Smile.one page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 324 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

smile.one performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,220 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.5 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

smile.one

30 ms

smile.one

32 ms

www.smile.one

28 ms

www.smile.one

58 ms

global.css

19 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Smile.one, 14% (3 requests) were made to Img.smile.one and 9% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (117 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 234.0 kB (62%)

Content Size

380.0 kB

After Optimization

146.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Smile.one main page is 380.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 251.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 224.4 kB

  • Original 251.9 kB
  • After minification 180.4 kB
  • After compression 27.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 71.5 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 224.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 26.6 kB
  • After minification 26.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Smile images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 83.9 kB
  • After minification 83.9 kB
  • After compression 74.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 108 B

  • Original 17.6 kB
  • After minification 17.6 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smile.one has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (72%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

smile.one

smile.one

30 ms

smile.one

smile.one

32 ms

www.smile.one

www.smile.one

28 ms

www.smile.one

www.smile.one

58 ms

global.css

global.css

19 ms

layout.css

layout.css

33 ms

components.css

components.css

27 ms

home.css

home.css

32 ms

js

js

92 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

18 ms

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

62 ms

components.js

components.js

29 ms

utils.js

utils.js

71 ms

layout.js

layout.js

73 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

74 ms

home.js

home.js

73 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

70 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

117 ms

2osaziyb1x1pr311713928849.png

2osaziyb1x1pr311713928849.png

72 ms

71yjq5q7rgycwzh1704275254.png

71yjq5q7rgycwzh1704275254.png

65 ms

xthlv7qx9kb4vgj1703743451.png

xthlv7qx9kb4vgj1703743451.png

72 ms

main.js

main.js

9 ms

Accessibility Review

smile.one accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

smile.one best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

smile.one SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    PT

  • Language Claimed

    PT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smile.one can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Portuguese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smile.one main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

smile.one

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Smile. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: