Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

smspool.net

Cheap SMS Verifications, non-VoIP phone numbers - SMSPool

Page Load Speed

9.4 sec in total

First Response

62 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

5.7 sec

smspool.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SMSPool content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about smspool.net

We provide SMS verifications using our non-VOIP phone numbers you can bypass any SMS verification. Sign up now for the highest quality SMS verifications for your accounts!

Visit smspool.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Smspool.net page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

smspool.net performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

83/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.106

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.smspool.net

62 ms

style.min.css

17 ms

discord.svg

79 ms

google-icon.svg

203 ms

logo.svg

160 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Smspool.net, 51% (36 requests) were made to Fonts.bunny.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Smspool.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.8 kB (39%)

Content Size

138.5 kB

After Optimization

84.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Smspool.net main page is 138.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 74.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 53.5 kB

  • Original 74.8 kB
  • After minification 74.8 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 72% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 41 B

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 174 B

  • Original 10.8 kB
  • After minification 10.8 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smspool.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (38%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SMSPool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

smspool.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

smspool.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

smspool.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smspool.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smspool.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SMSPool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: