3.3 sec in total
132 ms
3 sec
160 ms
Click here to check amazing Snap Files content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about snapfiles.com
Download freeware and shareware programs, fully reviewed and rated by SnapFiles staff, and user reviews. Established in 1997
Visit snapfiles.comWe analyzed Snapfiles.com page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
snapfiles.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value2,960 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
132 ms
590 ms
219 ms
248 ms
321 ms
Our browser made a total of 118 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Snapfiles.com, 9% (11 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (9 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (708 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 215.2 kB (22%)
970.9 kB
755.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Snapfiles.com main page is 970.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 695.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.2 kB, which is 40% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snap Files images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 135.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.4 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snapfiles.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (58%)
105
44
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snap Files. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
snapfiles.com
132 ms
www.snapfiles.com
590 ms
reset.css
219 ms
cs3.css
248 ms
snapfiles10-5.css
321 ms
css
36 ms
css
53 ms
css
60 ms
show_ads.js
90 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
45 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
63 ms
analytics.js
79 ms
sflogo-smaller.png
173 ms
searchbg.png
123 ms
searchbutton.png
173 ms
navarrow-down.png
123 ms
navarrow-up.png
173 ms
tixati-hl.png
256 ms
main-nav-arrow.png
269 ms
i_wise365.png
257 ms
trendup.png
268 ms
i_qdir.gif
269 ms
i_pdfsam.png
269 ms
i_freedownloadmanager.gif
320 ms
i_netsetman.gif
446 ms
i_cdiskinfo.gif
323 ms
i_vivaldi.png
446 ms
trenddown.png
321 ms
i_axvision.gif
446 ms
i_moneymanex.gif
444 ms
i_playon.gif
445 ms
alterpdf.png
601 ms
40star.png
567 ms
userrating5.png
565 ms
i_aimp.gif
566 ms
expand.png
500 ms
45star.png
565 ms
t_aimp.gif
567 ms
popmeter4.png
566 ms
i_calibre.gif
598 ms
50star.png
600 ms
userrating4.png
601 ms
t_calibre.png
619 ms
popmeter8.png
620 ms
i_volumouse.gif
623 ms
t_volumouse.png
663 ms
popmeter5.png
663 ms
i_fotosketcher.gif
657 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
107 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
109 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf
158 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf
159 ms
adsbygoogle.js
133 ms
t_fotosketcher.jpg
559 ms
popmeter6.png
559 ms
collect
90 ms
i_dropbox.gif
517 ms
t_dropbox.gif
572 ms
i_focuswriter.gif
572 ms
show_ads_impl.js
264 ms
t_focuswriter.jpg
490 ms
js
68 ms
i_dbpoweramp.gif
478 ms
t_dbpoweramp.gif
475 ms
i_alregcleaner.png
478 ms
30star.png
527 ms
t_alregcleaner.png
533 ms
i_nexus.png
497 ms
t_nexus.gif
497 ms
i_synchredible.gif
497 ms
t_synchredible.png
360 ms
i_httptoolkit.png
407 ms
i_browserdownloads.png
415 ms
zrt_lookup.html
47 ms
ads
708 ms
ads
626 ms
reactive_library.js
156 ms
pixel
65 ms
dv3.js
90 ms
gen_204
66 ms
window_focus.js
18 ms
qs_click_protection.js
22 ms
ufs_web_display.js
20 ms
pixel
53 ms
pixel
75 ms
ad
167 ms
8610131677387735518
241 ms
load_preloaded_resource.js
242 ms
abg_lite.js
255 ms
bbcd6bf18c20baa1b2adeb195de9b551.js
184 ms
fullscreen_api_adapter.js
144 ms
interstitial_ad_frame.js
149 ms
abg_lite.js
149 ms
Q12zgMmT.js
160 ms
icon.png
148 ms
feedback_grey600_24dp.png
285 ms
settings_grey600_24dp.png
302 ms
rum
149 ms
bounce
146 ms
pixel
147 ms
pixel
164 ms
ad
170 ms
gen_204
79 ms
179 ms
pixel
42 ms
css
35 ms
rum
135 ms
62bHydCX.html
118 ms
pixel
132 ms
pixel
131 ms
4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf
99 ms
4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf
99 ms
44 ms
activeview
128 ms
rum
97 ms
setuid
99 ms
WGg91BhL6Bhk3qTAPqmblqNZdzujbVjDoJfr3h8Q3EY.js
5 ms
ftUtils.js
119 ms
snapfiles.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
snapfiles.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
snapfiles.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snapfiles.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Snapfiles.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
snapfiles.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Snap Files. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: