Tools & Wizards About Us
softwharf.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

softwharf.com

国产在线视频导航_国产成人自拍_国产se01在线观看

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

159 ms

softwharf.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to softwharf.com homepage info - get ready to check Softwharf best content right away, or after learning these important things about softwharf.com

国产在线视频导航,国产成人自拍,国产se01在线观看,国产亲子乱XXXXiuiu,国产自在自钱2020

Visit softwharf.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Softwharf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

softwharf.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.079

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.softwharf.com

1461 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

128 ms

style.css

125 ms

dashicons.min.css

142 ms

desktop_style.css

110 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Softwharf.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Softwharf.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 620.6 kB (52%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

576.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Softwharf.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 474.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 43.8 kB

  • Original 56.1 kB
  • After minification 55.4 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 17.8 kB

  • Original 333.6 kB
  • After minification 315.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Softwharf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 302.9 kB

  • Original 474.1 kB
  • After minification 469.4 kB
  • After compression 171.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 302.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 256.2 kB

  • Original 333.6 kB
  • After minification 318.2 kB
  • After compression 77.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Softwharf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 256.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (74%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Softwharf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.softwharf.com

www.softwharf.com

1461 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

128 ms

style.css

style.css

125 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

142 ms

desktop_style.css

desktop_style.css

110 ms

styles.css

styles.css

132 ms

blue.css

blue.css

108 ms

style.css

style.css

154 ms

addtoany.min.css

addtoany.min.css

194 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

272 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

229 ms

tracker.js

tracker.js

213 ms

front_end_script.js

front_end_script.js

229 ms

my_style.css

my_style.css

244 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

309 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

309 ms

placeholders.js

placeholders.js

309 ms

scroll-to-top.js

scroll-to-top.js

310 ms

selectnav.js

selectnav.js

311 ms

responzive.js

responzive.js

353 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

356 ms

dentistry9.jpg

dentistry9.jpg

1573 ms

icon-date.png

icon-date.png

144 ms

icon-author.png

icon-author.png

143 ms

icon-category.png

icon-category.png

143 ms

Cosmetic-Dentist-Oakville-300x134.png

Cosmetic-Dentist-Oakville-300x134.png

194 ms

cosmetic-dentistry-300x200.jpg

cosmetic-dentistry-300x200.jpg

148 ms

empty.gif

empty.gif

148 ms

dentistry12.jpg

dentistry12.jpg

195 ms

dentistry11.jpg

dentistry11.jpg

1572 ms

page.js

page.js

26 ms

OE7hIA9D654

OE7hIA9D654

139 ms

searchform-send.png

searchform-send.png

1629 ms

pattern-1.png

pattern-1.png

1628 ms

sm13.html

sm13.html

99 ms

icons.34.png

icons.34.png

102 ms

scroll-top.png

scroll-top.png

1499 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

28 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

48 ms

base.js

base.js

1427 ms

ga.js

ga.js

1423 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

34 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

23 ms

QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf

QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf

17 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

39 ms

Accessibility Review

softwharf.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

softwharf.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

softwharf.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Softwharf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Softwharf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

softwharf.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Softwharf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: