Tools & Wizards About Us
spamstool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

spamstool.com

spamstool.com - Spam Tool | Mailers | Shells | Cpanels | Email Sender Tools | Inbox Smtps | RDP | Scampages | Letters | Valid Email Checkers | Spammin...

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

114 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

623 ms

spamstool.com screenshot

About Website

Visit spamstool.com now to see the best up-to-date Spam S Tool content for Bangladesh and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about spamstool.com

Best shop to buy Spam Tool | Mailers | Shells | Cpanels | Email Sender Tools | Inbox Smtps | RDP | Scampages | Letters | Valid Email Checkers | Spamming Course | Carding tools | Zombi Bot And All Spam...

Visit spamstool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Spamstool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 114 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

spamstool.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,000 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

spamstool.com

114 ms

spamstool.com

376 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

43 ms

js

164 ms

chaty-front.min.css

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Spamstool.com, 27% (17 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (376 ms) belongs to the original domain Spamstool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 222.0 kB (44%)

Content Size

503.0 kB

After Optimization

281.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Spamstool.com main page is 503.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 242.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 219.2 kB

  • Original 242.8 kB
  • After minification 191.4 kB
  • After compression 23.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 51.4 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 219.2 kB or 90% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 222.0 kB
  • After minification 222.0 kB
  • After compression 219.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 38.2 kB
  • After minification 38.2 kB
  • After compression 38.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spamstool.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (97%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spam S Tool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

spamstool.com

spamstool.com

114 ms

spamstool.com

spamstool.com

376 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

43 ms

js

js

164 ms

chaty-front.min.css

chaty-front.min.css

90 ms

styles.css

styles.css

84 ms

btca_style.css

btca_style.css

84 ms

icons-close.css

icons-close.css

84 ms

woocommerce-notification.min.css

woocommerce-notification.min.css

91 ms

woocommerce-notification-templates.css

woocommerce-notification-templates.css

107 ms

flatsome.css

flatsome.css

119 ms

flatsome-shop.css

flatsome-shop.css

106 ms

style.css

style.css

127 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

129 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

128 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

127 ms

btca_script.js

btca_script.js

127 ms

woocommerce-notification.min.js

woocommerce-notification.min.js

133 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

116 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

116 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

125 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

124 ms

front.js

front.js

134 ms

js

js

204 ms

tw-bs4.css

tw-bs4.css

135 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

131 ms

front.css

front.css

144 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

127 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

154 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

128 ms

cht-front-script.min.js

cht-front-script.min.js

147 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

126 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

125 ms

index.js

index.js

144 ms

index.js

index.js

144 ms

mailchimp-woocommerce-public.min.js

mailchimp-woocommerce-public.min.js

146 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

128 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

127 ms

flatsome.js

flatsome.js

223 ms

flatsome-wp-rocket.js

flatsome-wp-rocket.js

226 ms

flatsome-live-search.js

flatsome-live-search.js

227 ms

wpmssab.min.js

wpmssab.min.js

224 ms

SmoothScroll.min.js

SmoothScroll.min.js

222 ms

wpmss.min.js

wpmss.min.js

225 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

129 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

128 ms

api.js

api.js

220 ms

index.js

index.js

227 ms

woocommerce.js

woocommerce.js

227 ms

e-202449.js

e-202449.js

125 ms

akismet-frontend.js

akismet-frontend.js

230 ms

packery.pkgd.min.js

packery.pkgd.min.js

228 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

127 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

127 ms

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

128 ms

brave.js

brave.js

229 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

227 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

191 ms

css

css

101 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf

78 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

79 ms

fl-icons.ttf

fl-icons.ttf

297 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

27 ms

Accessibility Review

spamstool.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

spamstool.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

spamstool.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spamstool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spamstool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

spamstool.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: