1.5 sec in total
95 ms
943 ms
504 ms
Click here to check amazing Specs For content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about specsfor.com
Visit specsfor.comWe analyzed Specsfor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 95 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
specsfor.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value4.0 s
50/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value15,190 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value23.0 s
1/100
10%
95 ms
21 ms
57 ms
21 ms
56 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Specsfor.com, 14% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Gist.github.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (199 ms) relates to the external source Gist.github.com.
Page size can be reduced by 688.0 kB (75%)
913.5 kB
225.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Specsfor.com main page is 913.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 484.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Specs For needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.6 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 330.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 330.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 325.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Specsfor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 325.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (75%)
36
9
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Specs For. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
specsfor.com
95 ms
reset.css
21 ms
layout.css
57 ms
style.css
21 ms
font-awesome.min.css
56 ms
jquery.min.js
59 ms
cufon-yui.js
55 ms
cufon-replace.js
20 ms
Didact_Gothic_400.font.js
101 ms
Shanti_400.font.js
114 ms
roundabout.js
100 ms
roundabout_shapes.js
100 ms
jquery.easing.1.2.js
99 ms
script.js
99 ms
1413596.js
199 ms
forkme_right_darkblue_121621.png
38 ms
bg_top.gif
8 ms
header_bg.png
34 ms
line_top.gif
9 ms
logo.png
9 ms
menu_bg.gif
7 ms
menu_bg_left.gif
6 ms
menu_bg_right.gif
9 ms
button_1.png
10 ms
twitter.png
10 ms
MVwguBsR6eA
151 ms
1413596.js
115 ms
gist-embed-00e78e58c090554178aab653e8643d5e.css
60 ms
www-player.css
11 ms
www-embed-player.js
40 ms
base.js
131 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
97 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
30 ms
menu_bg_active.gif
160 ms
menu_bg_left_active.gif
165 ms
menu_bg_right_active.gif
159 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
19 ms
ad_status.js
198 ms
36t2pzUCsky2p8StOfRDuZ2SQrRQGkwFUvrIpVyovYo.js
134 ms
embed.js
32 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
34 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
37 ms
specsfor.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
specsfor.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
specsfor.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Specsfor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Specsfor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
specsfor.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Specs For. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: