13.2 sec in total
2.6 sec
10.1 sec
477 ms
Visit spectank-carolinas.com now to see the best up-to-date Spectank Carolinas content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about spectank-carolinas.com
dab dab
Visit spectank-carolinas.comWe analyzed Spectank-carolinas.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 10.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
spectank-carolinas.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value10.8 s
0/100
25%
Value15.5 s
0/100
10%
Value510 ms
57/100
30%
Value0.2
62/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
2611 ms
44 ms
635 ms
931 ms
964 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Spectank-carolinas.com, 12% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Spectank-carolinas.com.
Page size can be reduced by 150.7 kB (6%)
2.4 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Spectank-carolinas.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 93.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Spectank Carolinas images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spectank-carolinas.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (43%)
75
43
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spectank Carolinas. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
spectank-carolinas.com
2611 ms
analytics.js
44 ms
autotrack.ca946afc.js
635 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
931 ms
style.min.css
964 ms
ab-simple-subscribe.css
953 ms
custom-login.css
967 ms
font-awesome.min.css
44 ms
style.min.css
1294 ms
style.css
989 ms
bootstrap-responsive-1170.min.css
1254 ms
css
60 ms
css
80 ms
css
93 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1270 ms
icomoon.css
1310 ms
Default-Skin_54ce98c851b37c14ba88fe891dd1e475.css
1286 ms
smartslider.min.css
1323 ms
css
84 ms
jquery.min.js
1578 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1588 ms
rs6.css
1610 ms
n2.min.js
1337 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
1354 ms
ss-simple.min.js
1380 ms
w-arrow-image.min.js
1620 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
1626 ms
ab-simple-subscribe.js
1651 ms
rbtools.min.js
1667 ms
rs6.min.js
2030 ms
app.min.js
2045 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1944 ms
jquery-flexslider.min.js
1945 ms
collect
12 ms
js
66 ms
style.css
1601 ms
Spectank-logo-header.png
384 ms
Slider-1.jpg
663 ms
Slider-2.jpg
1256 ms
Slider-3.jpg
683 ms
Affordable.png
384 ms
Spectank-Home-2.png
1315 ms
Parallax-3.jpg
1635 ms
Easy-Cleaning.png
699 ms
Save-on-chemicals.png
1002 ms
Save-energy-1.png
1006 ms
Save-on-water.png
1036 ms
Home-icons.png
1338 ms
Models.jpg
1333 ms
BeforeAfter1-500x474.jpg
2027 ms
BeforeAfter2-500x433.jpg
1887 ms
BeforeAfter3.jpg
1643 ms
BeforeAfter4.jpg
1661 ms
BeforeAfter5.jpg
1676 ms
BeforeAfter6-500x500.jpg
1960 ms
BeforeAfter7-500x500.jpg
1969 ms
BeforeAfter8-500x498.jpg
1989 ms
1.png
2011 ms
One-Clean-Logo.jpg
2208 ms
Drive-Up-Logo.jpg
2288 ms
3.png
2294 ms
Miroil-1.png
2317 ms
Stera-Sheen.png
2352 ms
Grillmaster.png
2361 ms
The-Ballantyne-Hotel-2.jpg
2528 ms
Dresslers-Restaurant.jpg
2616 ms
Coquette-Brasserie.jpg
2618 ms
Ruths-Chris-Steak-House.jpg
2642 ms
Grill-584-1.jpg
2686 ms
Fin-and-Fino.jpg
2694 ms
Porters-House.jpg
2852 ms
Mimosa-Grill.jpg
2878 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcABrH.woff
199 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcABrH.woff
200 ms
w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uJ.woff
296 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
197 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJg.woff
361 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDrMfJg.woff
362 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
316 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
318 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
316 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
314 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
316 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
316 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2563 ms
Burke-Hospitality-Group.jpg
2592 ms
Chillis-Restaurant.jpg
2364 ms
Rare-Roots-Hospitality.jpg
2351 ms
Harpers-Restaurant.jpg
2476 ms
spectank-carolinas.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
spectank-carolinas.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
spectank-carolinas.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spectank-carolinas.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spectank-carolinas.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
spectank-carolinas.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Spectank Carolinas. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: