4.9 sec in total
406 ms
4.4 sec
69 ms
Click here to check amazing Spid content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about spid.center
Все, что нужно знать про ВИЧ и СПИД, чтобы жить долго и счастливо, любить, творить, создать семью и рожать здоровых детей
Visit spid.centerWe analyzed Spid.center page load time and found that the first response time was 406 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
spid.center performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value36.4 s
0/100
25%
Value32.2 s
0/100
10%
Value8,290 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value57.0 s
0/100
10%
406 ms
562 ms
958 ms
436 ms
409 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Spid.center, 7% (4 requests) were made to Top-fwz1.mail.ru and 5% (3 requests) were made to Api.zadarma.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Spid.center.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (9%)
12.4 MB
11.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Spid.center main page is 12.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 146.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 852.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Spid images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 154.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 154.5 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (27%)
51
37
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spid. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
spid.center
406 ms
spid.center
562 ms
ru
958 ms
application-9360726c48f839ee9e8b.css
436 ms
modernizr.js
409 ms
embed.js
23 ms
ct_phone.min.js
583 ms
css
31 ms
application-9360726c48f839ee9e8b.js
951 ms
cloudpayments
705 ms
OneSignalSDK.js
32 ms
regular_main_feature_picture-05f298910b0974f38622866d754802e2.jpg
670 ms
regular_main_feature_picture-e668c5510882a3a5a9526b8031e494b5.jpg
1088 ms
regular_main_feature_picture-b6535a6a18f0483b01c93b033477b614.jpg
1600 ms
regular_main_feature_picture-cec5093a99f2f729a016848e878b7d88.jpg
1205 ms
regular_main_feature_picture-48c86d511d1a00f531eb4299aecda712.jpg
1203 ms
vaccines-3.png
986 ms
regular_preview_picture-e668c5510882a3a5a9526b8031e494b5.jpg
806 ms
regular_preview_picture-f756cd3aba569fc6fef0d23d4872fc09.jpg
945 ms
UPjJljV.gif
1090 ms
regular_preview_picture-923bb760e3a57013833f2cea167cd6cf.jpg
1120 ms
regular_preview_picture-48c86d511d1a00f531eb4299aecda712.jpg
1209 ms
regular_preview_picture-05f298910b0974f38622866d754802e2.jpg
1217 ms
regular_preview_picture-349021b158b3bdcc0532aec103694001.jpg
1256 ms
regular_preview_picture-25abd13dafb5c22948ebaa0f4bb71f61.jpg
1338 ms
regular_preview_picture-c9512b12bbfac074bc307f526bb78b76.jpg
1340 ms
regular_preview_picture-893699184e4651d4b9f9c4f63b0eb4b6.png
1346 ms
map_pin.svg
1354 ms
regular_preview_picture-1a6b8e697e522ba062cbf1bf81c42bec.jpg
1393 ms
regular_preview_picture-2976ca7cc886695c4cad3fd4df1895cc.png
1475 ms
regular_preview_picture-f238933e9aae318dc83e303a007b61c2.jpg
1475 ms
regular_preview_picture-c45891d939a8c709a434ee78fbebcf0e.jpg
1479 ms
regular_preview_picture-090c4f4baa3ca6b7881eb9e460cb3206.jpg
1488 ms
regular_preview_picture-385fc075f01414fa8bca9c7123308d05.jpg
1528 ms
3Lrw0uw.png
1626 ms
3D6yd0a.png
1617 ms
rY2Lzn3.png
1623 ms
openapi.c340c125c61ec5745ebb2a98626e46ab.js
231 ms
Gerbera-Light.woff
1548 ms
Gerbera.woff
1586 ms
Gerbera-Medium.woff
1652 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
code.js
832 ms
tag.js
957 ms
collect
12 ms
js
58 ms
522 ms
27.application-9360726c48f839ee9e8b.js
1124 ms
sync-loader.js
851 ms
counter
157 ms
dyn-goal-config.js
258 ms
668 ms
689 ms
722 ms
advert.gif
738 ms
3D6yd0a.png
270 ms
rY2Lzn3.png
265 ms
1
347 ms
6.application-9360726c48f839ee9e8b.js
154 ms
tracker
130 ms
spid.center accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
spid.center best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
spid.center SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spid.center can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spid.center main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
spid.center
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Spid. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: