Tools & Wizards About Us
spiderworking.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

spiderworking.com

Amanda Webb-Spiderworking: Digital Marketing ROI Consultant Ireland

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

295 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

371 ms

spiderworking.com screenshot

About Website

Visit spiderworking.com now to see the best up-to-date Spiderworking content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about spiderworking.com

One-2-One Digital Marketing Support For Your Business. Could your business be getting more sales through online marketing? Is your online marketing eating your company's time but not delivering t...

Visit spiderworking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Spiderworking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 295 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

spiderworking.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,430 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.386

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

spiderworking.com

295 ms

spiderworking.com

919 ms

style-blocks.build.css

96 ms

blocks.style.build.css

190 ms

style.css

279 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Spiderworking.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Consent.cookiefirst.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (919 ms) belongs to the original domain Spiderworking.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 177.6 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Spiderworking.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 125.0 kB

  • Original 157.6 kB
  • After minification 156.1 kB
  • After compression 32.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Spiderworking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 39.1 kB

  • Original 151.6 kB
  • After minification 151.1 kB
  • After compression 112.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 39.1 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 89.5 kB
  • After minification 89.3 kB
  • After compression 76.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spiderworking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (90%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spiderworking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

spiderworking.com

spiderworking.com

295 ms

spiderworking.com

spiderworking.com

919 ms

style-blocks.build.css

style-blocks.build.css

96 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

190 ms

style.css

style.css

279 ms

style.css

style.css

369 ms

broadcasts.css

broadcasts.css

280 ms

button.css

button.css

280 ms

form.css

form.css

281 ms

rounded-thumbs.min.css

rounded-thumbs.min.css

281 ms

cookiefirst-plugin-public.css

cookiefirst-plugin-public.css

372 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

466 ms

css

css

40 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

464 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

472 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

372 ms

cookiefirst-plugin-public.js

cookiefirst-plugin-public.js

460 ms

consent.js

consent.js

116 ms

js

js

84 ms

index.js

index.js

113 ms

index.js

index.js

181 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

461 ms

broadcasts.js

broadcasts.js

488 ms

convertkit.js

convertkit.js

599 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

600 ms

dismiss.js

dismiss.js

602 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

600 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

600 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

601 ms

superfish.args.min.js

superfish.args.min.js

737 ms

skip-links.min.js

skip-links.min.js

735 ms

responsive-menus.min.js

responsive-menus.min.js

736 ms

wp-consent-api.min.js

wp-consent-api.min.js

736 ms

banner.no-autoblock.js

banner.no-autoblock.js

60 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

118 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

118 ms

amanda-webb-spiderworking-transparent-1.png

amanda-webb-spiderworking-transparent-1.png

260 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

105 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

106 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

106 ms

qWi4zUqGW8MtZPtGRfrwyK

qWi4zUqGW8MtZPtGRfrwyK

171 ms

ck.5.js

ck.5.js

178 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

65 ms

uwt.js

uwt.js

55 ms

gxjx34sz9d

gxjx34sz9d

92 ms

Accessibility Review

spiderworking.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

spiderworking.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

spiderworking.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spiderworking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spiderworking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

spiderworking.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Spiderworking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: