4.3 sec in total
210 ms
2 sec
2.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Spivack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about spivack.com
Our eye care services cover everything from eye exams to clear lens exchange, LASIK, and cataract surgery. Schedule your appointment today.
Visit spivack.comWe analyzed Spivack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 210 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
spivack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value5.2 s
24/100
25%
Value17.1 s
0/100
10%
Value39,120 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.149
76/100
15%
Value51.5 s
0/100
10%
210 ms
421 ms
143 ms
381 ms
114 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Spivack.com, 34% (19 requests) were made to Omnieye.com and 14% (8 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (896 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 114.8 kB (11%)
1.1 MB
966.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Spivack.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 750.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 354 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Spivack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 20.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 20.7 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spivack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (49%)
45
23
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spivack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
spivack.com
210 ms
www.omnieye.com
421 ms
gtm.js
143 ms
autoptimize_fbadea09eb2106f6086f02a79e9d8efd.css
381 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
114 ms
lazysizes.min.js
608 ms
micromodal.min.js
607 ms
webfont.js
610 ms
autoptimize_59f7e9abc22e5711cfca7b83f5e32c59.js
607 ms
analytics.js
409 ms
fbevents.js
332 ms
embed
599 ms
embed
896 ms
embed
858 ms
embed
858 ms
embed
856 ms
embed
856 ms
embed
853 ms
search_icon_1search_icon.png
251 ms
hero-img.jpg
459 ms
portal-icon_1portal-icon.png
250 ms
pay-online-icon_1pay-online-icon.png
283 ms
appointment-icon_1appointment-icon.png
283 ms
locations-icon-black_1locations-icon-black.png
376 ms
phone-icon_1phone-icon.png
376 ms
cataract-test-img.jpg
580 ms
appointment-img.jpg
579 ms
lenses-img.jpg
512 ms
lasik-test-img.jpg
581 ms
advanced-tech-callout.jpg
644 ms
bg-img2.jpg
582 ms
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
1 ms
widget.js
141 ms
micromodal.min.js
42 ms
logo-white.svg
404 ms
facebook-dark.png
468 ms
css
100 ms
identity.js
58 ms
241728256877548
153 ms
collect
35 ms
collect
123 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
46 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
76 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
90 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
91 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
89 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
88 ms
js
27 ms
gen_204
23 ms
init_embed.js
25 ms
common.js
124 ms
util.js
165 ms
map.js
155 ms
overlay.js
98 ms
onion.js
66 ms
search_impl.js
64 ms
spivack.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
spivack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
spivack.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spivack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spivack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
spivack.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Spivack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: