6.3 sec in total
216 ms
5.6 sec
530 ms
Welcome to spoffer.net homepage info - get ready to check Spoffer best content right away, or after learning these important things about spoffer.net
Simple new way to get great offers
Visit spoffer.netWe analyzed Spoffer.net page load time and found that the first response time was 216 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
spoffer.net performance score
216 ms
1203 ms
662 ms
1411 ms
734 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Spoffer.net, 65% (32 requests) were made to Static.spoffer.net and 8% (4 requests) were made to Sumome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Static.spoffer.net.
Page size can be reduced by 936.4 kB (44%)
2.1 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Spoffer.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.3 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 118.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Spoffer needs image optimization as it can save up to 118.9 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 552.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 552.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 231.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spoffer.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 231.3 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (51%)
47
23
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spoffer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
spoffer.net
216 ms
www.spoffer.net
1203 ms
spoffer.global.css
662 ms
spoffer.portal.css
1411 ms
thirdparty.css
734 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
1551 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.0.custom.min.js
2793 ms
modernizr-2.7.1.min.js
661 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
870 ms
jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js
768 ms
jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js
836 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
882 ms
jeoquery.min.js
948 ms
jquery.nailthumb.1.1.min.js
950 ms
thirdparty.js
2518 ms
jquery.geocomplete.min.js
1078 ms
js
137 ms
json2.min.js
1079 ms
spoffer.common.min.js
1123 ms
spoffer.portal.min.js
1314 ms
load.sumome.com
498 ms
analytics.js
128 ms
counter.js
143 ms
collect
122 ms
t.php
163 ms
sprite-portal.png
210 ms
header-item-border.png
158 ms
sprite-global.png
159 ms
how-it-works.png
210 ms
appstore.png
219 ms
google-play.png
280 ms
705ad52b-000a-4852-8476-40a24a933c74.jpg
228 ms
f45decd5-8f69-4f13-aa91-19739b600193.jpg
290 ms
9e628294-b842-47c8-90ab-c81650029e31.jpg
289 ms
00371154-2c1f-4e9b-970e-0e34242b234a.jpg
294 ms
863df88d-bb9a-4680-8e4b-80a85be7d4f5.jpg
315 ms
teaser-loading-1f0d6e7.png
265 ms
459 ms
442 ms
loading-gray.gif
423 ms
Offer.Image.0da3fc73-18bf-48ca-84dc-fb3de0a87a3c.jpg
634 ms
Offer.Image.4a1f3e6b-e64d-4151-8134-02301892636e.jpg
705 ms
service.js
254 ms
service.js
234 ms
sumome-scrollbox-popup.css
74 ms
sme-popup.css
82 ms
load
321 ms
load
318 ms
css
150 ms
spoffer.net SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spoffer.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Spoffer.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
spoffer.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Spoffer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: