2.4 sec in total
587 ms
1.5 sec
244 ms
Click here to check amazing Sportsbook Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sportsbookreview.com
Visit sportsbookreview.comWe analyzed Sportsbookreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 587 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
sportsbookreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.154
75/100
15%
Value8.9 s
35/100
10%
587 ms
125 ms
41 ms
70 ms
42 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Sportsbookreview.com, 55% (30 requests) were made to Sbrcdn.static-files.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to P.jwpcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (587 ms) belongs to the original domain Sportsbookreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (66%)
2.1 MB
709.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Sportsbookreview.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.2 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sportsbook Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 50.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 214.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 214.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sportsbookreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (47%)
51
27
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sportsbook Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sportsbookreview.com
587 ms
www.sportsbookreview.com
125 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
41 ms
jquery-ui.gz.css
70 ms
sbr.css
42 ms
jquery.min.js
100 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
36 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
154 ms
133 ms
jsapi
32 ms
135 ms
jquery.sbr.pagination.core.js
30 ms
jquery.sbr.pagination.sbrRepeaterEngine.js
28 ms
jquery.filtersBridge.js
123 ms
jquery.sbr.filtersBridge.js
122 ms
jquery.sbr.sportsbooksCompare.js
25 ms
sportsbook-review-logo-xs.svg
64 ms
514 ms
sportsbook-review-logo.svg
39 ms
home-rating.jpg
40 ms
home-bonuses.jpg
36 ms
home-reviews.jpg
41 ms
rss_icon.gif
40 ms
coldcase_nw.jpg
43 ms
icon_play_small.png
45 ms
oscars_nw.jpg
45 ms
bonusnw25.jpg
45 ms
bitcoin_nw.jpg
44 ms
1xbet_nw.jpg
49 ms
sbrodds_nw.jpg
46 ms
bonus_nw.jpg
48 ms
scale_nw.jpg
47 ms
marathonbet_nw.jpg
47 ms
betowi_nw.jpg
48 ms
spr_home.png
51 ms
bull-white.png
40 ms
seen-on-logos.svg
160 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
26 ms
ga.js
150 ms
swfobject.js
64 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
collect
48 ms
jquery.ui.timepicker.js
8 ms
jquery.sbr.pinnedhtml.js
7 ms
89 ms
reset-min.css
19 ms
bootstrap.min.gz.js
18 ms
sbr.css
97 ms
embed.css
41 ms
jwplayer.js
11 ms
jquery.sbrforum.video.js
14 ms
jwpsrv.js
55 ms
related.js
58 ms
gapro.js
60 ms
sharing.js
59 ms
sportsbookreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sportsbookreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sportsbookreview.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sportsbookreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sportsbookreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sportsbookreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sportsbook Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: