Tools & Wizards About Us
springerprotocols.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 99

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

springerprotocols.com

Springer Protocols platform has migrated to Experiments

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

1.9 sec

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

415 ms

springerprotocols.com screenshot

About Website

Visit springerprotocols.com now to see the best up-to-date Springer Protocols content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about springerprotocols.com

Search and evaluate Springer Nature protocols and methods here

Visit springerprotocols.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Springerprotocols.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

springerprotocols.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.3 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value820 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

springer-protocols-migrated-to-experiments

1880 ms

polyfill.min.js

1007 ms

gdpr-consent-bundle-7-13.js

29 ms

springernature.min.js

138 ms

745ae98c1b8dc107a47f5f63d285b66d-mathjax_config.js

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Springerprotocols.com, 38% (20 requests) were made to Experiments.springernature.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Experiments.springernature.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (70%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

590.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Springerprotocols.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 925.3 kB
  • After compression 92.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 537.0 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 94% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 30.3 kB

  • Original 511.5 kB
  • After minification 481.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Springer Protocols images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 16.8 kB
  • After minification 16.8 kB
  • After compression 16.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (19%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

39

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Springer Protocols. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

springer-protocols-migrated-to-experiments

springer-protocols-migrated-to-experiments

1880 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1007 ms

gdpr-consent-bundle-7-13.js

gdpr-consent-bundle-7-13.js

29 ms

springernature.min.js

springernature.min.js

138 ms

745ae98c1b8dc107a47f5f63d285b66d-mathjax_config.js

745ae98c1b8dc107a47f5f63d285b66d-mathjax_config.js

21 ms

MathJax.js

MathJax.js

40 ms

a7969ad8a59fea67e5e5772a16535841-bundle.css

a7969ad8a59fea67e5e5772a16535841-bundle.css

20 ms

322556adf3ded41d0d649c7ae9d9f58d-bundle.js

322556adf3ded41d0d649c7ae9d9f58d-bundle.js

13 ms

pa-5bbc4734cea07b0016000239.js

pa-5bbc4734cea07b0016000239.js

420 ms

9eed25be84335b02a7273223012f71db-MerriweatherSans-Variable.woff2

9eed25be84335b02a7273223012f71db-MerriweatherSans-Variable.woff2

3 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

139 ms

css

css

63 ms

TeX-MML-AM_CHTML.js

TeX-MML-AM_CHTML.js

16 ms

loading-dna.gif

loading-dna.gif

200 ms

7651_2024_515_Fig1_HTML.png

7651_2024_515_Fig1_HTML.png

240 ms

experiments_logo_RGB.png

experiments_logo_RGB.png

135 ms

icon-search.svg

icon-search.svg

211 ms

blue_bg_seachPage.jpg

blue_bg_seachPage.jpg

213 ms

search.svg

search.svg

209 ms

cancel-icon.svg

cancel-icon.svg

211 ms

triangle-down.svg

triangle-down.svg

224 ms

triangle-up.svg

triangle-up.svg

223 ms

chevron-select.png

chevron-select.png

224 ms

email.png

email.png

223 ms

like.png

like.png

225 ms

dislike.png

dislike.png

224 ms

icon-arrow-left-6x10-gray-light.svg

icon-arrow-left-6x10-gray-light.svg

234 ms

icon-arrow-right-6x10-blue.svg

icon-arrow-right-6x10-blue.svg

234 ms

sn_logo_footer.png

sn_logo_footer.png

234 ms

7651_2024_515_Fig2_HTML.png

7651_2024_515_Fig2_HTML.png

234 ms

7651_2020_299_Fig1_HTML.png

7651_2020_299_Fig1_HTML.png

239 ms

7651_2020_299_Fig2_HTML.png

7651_2020_299_Fig2_HTML.png

239 ms

7651_2020_299_Fig3_HTML.png

7651_2020_299_Fig3_HTML.png

238 ms

7651_2020_299_Fig4_HTML.png

7651_2020_299_Fig4_HTML.png

238 ms

7653_2020_47_Fig1_HTML.png

7653_2020_47_Fig1_HTML.png

269 ms

7653_2020_47_Fig2_HTML.png

7653_2020_47_Fig2_HTML.png

239 ms

7653_2020_47_Fig3_HTML.png

7653_2020_47_Fig3_HTML.png

242 ms

7653_2020_47_Fig4_HTML.png

7653_2020_47_Fig4_HTML.png

243 ms

7651_2023_499_Fig1_HTML.png

7651_2023_499_Fig1_HTML.png

287 ms

7651_2023_499_Fig2_HTML.png

7651_2023_499_Fig2_HTML.png

240 ms

7651_2023_499_Fig3_HTML.png

7651_2023_499_Fig3_HTML.png

241 ms

7651_2021_398_Fig1_HTML.png

7651_2021_398_Fig1_HTML.png

287 ms

7651_2021_398_Fig2_HTML.png

7651_2021_398_Fig2_HTML.png

263 ms

7651_2021_412_Fig1_HTML.jpg

7651_2021_412_Fig1_HTML.jpg

264 ms

7651_2021_412_Fig2_HTML.jpg

7651_2021_412_Fig2_HTML.jpg

262 ms

7651_2021_412_Fig3_HTML.png

7651_2021_412_Fig3_HTML.png

286 ms

7651_2021_412_Fig4_HTML.png

7651_2021_412_Fig4_HTML.png

285 ms

7653_2019_37_Fig1_HTML.png

7653_2019_37_Fig1_HTML.png

285 ms

7653_2019_37_Fig2_HTML.png

7653_2019_37_Fig2_HTML.png

287 ms

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf

98 ms

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l521wRZWMf_.ttf

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l521wRZWMf_.ttf

121 ms

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZWMf_.ttf

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZWMf_.ttf

141 ms

js

js

89 ms

Accessibility Review

springerprotocols.com accessibility score

99

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

springerprotocols.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

springerprotocols.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Springerprotocols.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Springerprotocols.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

springerprotocols.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Springer Protocols. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: