9.9 sec in total
2.3 sec
6.8 sec
780 ms
Visit srv32.de now to see the best up-to-date SRV32 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about srv32.de
Visit srv32.deWe analyzed Srv32.de page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
srv32.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value12.4 s
3/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.087
93/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
2285 ms
146 ms
332 ms
366 ms
466 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Srv32.de, 1% (1 request) were made to and 1% (1 request) were made to S.w.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Srv32.de.
Page size can be reduced by 517.0 kB (19%)
2.8 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Srv32.de main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 149.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 168.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SRV32 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 85.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.4 kB or 24% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Srv32.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 114.1 kB or 35% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (73%)
74
20
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SRV32. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.srv32.de
2285 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
146 ms
dashicons.min.css
332 ms
extra.min.css
366 ms
style.min.css
466 ms
classic-themes.min.css
368 ms
styles.css
316 ms
delightful-downloads.min.css
330 ms
style.css
369 ms
style.css
402 ms
ionicons.min.css
409 ms
flaticon.css
407 ms
flaticon-set.css
424 ms
font-awesome.min.css
464 ms
bootstrap.min.css
586 ms
framework-style.css
501 ms
nice-select.css
499 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
500 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
519 ms
animate.css
559 ms
bootsnav.css
594 ms
style.css
596 ms
responsive.css
592 ms
softing-update.css
615 ms
js_composer.min.css
675 ms
gdpr-main.css
702 ms
jquery.min.js
721 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
721 ms
custom.js
720 ms
inline-player.js
740 ms
animate.min.css
865 ms
font.css
866 ms
js_composer_tta.min.css
869 ms
rs6.css
867 ms
index.js
868 ms
index.js
869 ms
encoder-form.js
869 ms
rbtools.min.js
886 ms
rs6.min.js
702 ms
bootstrap.min.js
619 ms
equal-height.min.js
614 ms
equal-height-custom.js
615 ms
bootsnav.js
629 ms
smooth-scroll.min.js
610 ms
smoothscroll-custom.js
579 ms
framework-settings.js
604 ms
jquery.nice-select.min.js
639 ms
main.js
645 ms
jquery.scrollUp.min.js
640 ms
scrollup-custom.js
597 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
569 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
597 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
638 ms
carousel-custom.js
628 ms
vc-accordion.min.js
593 ms
vc-tta-autoplay.min.js
563 ms
vc-tabs.min.js
563 ms
SRV32_Logo-Kopie.png
610 ms
tree-832079_1280.jpg
612 ms
waves-shape.svg
832 ms
walk-4666509_1920-1024x683.jpg
612 ms
001.png
608 ms
droste_reiseb%C3%BCro.png
609 ms
Logo_FB_Piizeria.png
717 ms
bms_logo_retina.png
643 ms
HannsArntzen.png
539 ms
app-1.png
540 ms
Fems001.png
559 ms
003.png
614 ms
354834162321.png
613 ms
Visitenkarte_Oliver_Foto-500x500.png
997 ms
DSC_0059-e1575536743196-500x500.jpg
646 ms
man-1454744_1920.jpg
774 ms
SRV32_Logo-Kopie-300x76.png
651 ms
wARDj0u
14 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
650 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
770 ms
Flaticon-set.svg
2011 ms
Flaticon-set.woff
724 ms
Flaticon.svg
2022 ms
Flaticon.woff
743 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
751 ms
2764.svg
210 ms
srv32.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
srv32.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
srv32.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Srv32.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Srv32.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
srv32.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SRV32. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: